IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joprea/v42y2025i1d10.1007_s12546-025-09362-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examination of adolescent and youth modern contraceptive users’ perceptions on how religion influences contraceptive use and their rationale and circumstances of use: qualitative evidence from Burkina Faso, Kenya and Niger

Author

Listed:
  • Ilene S. Speizer

    (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

  • Fiacre Bazie

    (Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP) at the Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo)

  • Amelia Maytan-Joneydi

    (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

  • John A. Mushomi

    (African Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP)
    Makerere University)

  • Sanoussi Chaibou

    (Groupe de Recherche et d’Action Pour le Développement (GRADE Africa))

  • Kindo Boukary

    (Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP) at the Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo)

  • Balki Ibrahim Agali

    (Groupe de Recherche et d’Action Pour le Développement (GRADE Africa))

  • Julius Rwenyo

    (African Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP))

Abstract

While religion is a key determining factor of contraceptive use, few studies examine how religion influences adolescent and youth contraceptive attitudes, beliefs, and use. We use recently collected (August–November 2022) qualitative data from Burkina Faso, Kenya, and Niger among young users of modern contraception who practice Christianity or Islam. In-depth interviews with married and unmarried young women ages 18–24 years were conducted in two sites in each country to obtain a mix of religions and method users. In each country, many young Christian and Muslim women perceived that their religion is not supportive of contraceptive use. Some nuances around perceived acceptability of use were identified in Niger and among Muslim women in Kenya particularly for married women for spacing or health reasons. Reasons given for using related to realities of life, personal choices, and that use is their prerogative and God will forgive them. Most married women felt there would be few consequences if their religious community learned of their use whereas unmarried young women feared more consequences from their religious and broader community. These findings demonstrate that while religion is important in all three study contexts, decisions around contraceptive use among the young women included were not necessarily influenced by their religious beliefs and practices. As a greater number of young people adopt contraception, with or without perceived religious support, social norms are likely to change leading to increased access to contraception for all young women, married and unmarried, when or if they need it.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilene S. Speizer & Fiacre Bazie & Amelia Maytan-Joneydi & John A. Mushomi & Sanoussi Chaibou & Kindo Boukary & Balki Ibrahim Agali & Julius Rwenyo, 2025. "Examination of adolescent and youth modern contraceptive users’ perceptions on how religion influences contraceptive use and their rationale and circumstances of use: qualitative evidence from Burkina," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joprea:v:42:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12546-025-09362-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s12546-025-09362-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12546-025-09362-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12546-025-09362-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joprea:v:42:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12546-025-09362-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.