IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jopoec/v38y2025i1d10.1007_s00148-025-01087-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peers, parents, and self-perceptions: the gender gap in mathematics self-assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Adamecz

    (UCL Social Research Institute, KRTK KTI and IZA)

  • John Jerrim

    (UCL Social Research Institute)

  • Jean-Baptiste Pingault

    (UCL Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology and KCL Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre)

  • Nikki Shure

    (UCL Social Research Institute and IZA)

Abstract

It is well established that boys perceive themselves to be better in mathematics than girls, even when their ability is the same. We examine the drivers of the gender gap in self-assessed mathematics ability using a longitudinal study of twins. Using measures of individual self-assessment in mathematics from childhood, along with mathematics levels and test scores, cognitive skills, parent and teacher mathematics assessments, and characteristics of their families and siblings, we examine potential channels of the gender gap. Our results confirm that objective mathematics abilities only explain a small share of the gender gap in self-assessed mathematics abilities, and the gap is even larger within boy-girl twin pairs. We find that the self-assessment of boys is positively correlated with the self-assessment of their male co-twins, not just in mathematics, but also in other abilities. However, this positive correlation is not observed between girls and their male co-twins; if anything, it is negative. This indicates that boys and girls have different reactions to highly confident male peers. We also find that parents are more likely to overestimate boys’ and underestimate girls’ mathematics abilities. Gender-biased parental assessments explain a large part of the gender gap in mathematics self-assessment, highlighting the potential of the intergenerational transmission of gender stereotypes.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Adamecz & John Jerrim & Jean-Baptiste Pingault & Nikki Shure, 2025. "Peers, parents, and self-perceptions: the gender gap in mathematics self-assessment," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 38(1), pages 1-33, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jopoec:v:38:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s00148-025-01087-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s00148-025-01087-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00148-025-01087-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00148-025-01087-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gender gaps; Self-assessed mathematics ability; Twins; Peer effects;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jopoec:v:38:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s00148-025-01087-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.