Author
Listed:
- Mohammad Borumand
(Wichita State University
York College of Pennsylvania)
- Saideep Nannapaneni
(Wichita State University)
- Gurucharan Madiraddy
(University of Nebraska-Lincoln)
- Michael P. Sealy
(Purdue University)
- Sima Esfandiarpour Borujeni
(Wichita State University)
- Gisuk Hwang
(Wichita State University)
Abstract
Powder bed fusion is an innovative additive manufacturing (AM) technique to achieve metallic wick structures for efficient two-phase thermal management systems. However, a technical challenge lies in the lack of standard process maps as it currently relies on an expensive trial and error approach. In this study, five types of surrogate models for classification analysis (i.e., naïve Bayes, logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and Gaussian process classification) were constructed and compared to efficiently unlock the relations between five process parameters (i.e., laser power, scan speed, hatch spacing, spot diameter, and effective laser energy) and wick manufacturability. The models were trained using data from a total of 187 AM wick manufacturability experiments. Using four process parameter (PP) model (five PP model without effective laser energy), the Gaussian process classification (GPC) showed the maximum median prediction accuracy (PA) of 93%, while it further improved to 99.7% using support vector machine (SVM) and five process parameter model. Also, the median PAs of the SVM and GPC remains above 98.5% with only 60% of the total experimental data using five PP model. The sensitivity analysis showed that the hatch spacing was the most sensitive parameter for the wick manufacturability using four PP model, while the effective laser energy is the most sensitive one using five PP model. This study provides insights into the smart selection of optimal process parameters for the desired metallic AM wicks.
Suggested Citation
Mohammad Borumand & Saideep Nannapaneni & Gurucharan Madiraddy & Michael P. Sealy & Sima Esfandiarpour Borujeni & Gisuk Hwang, 2025.
"Smart process mapping of powder bed fusion additively manufactured metallic wicks using surrogate modeling,"
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 1819-1833, March.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-024-02330-5
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-024-02330-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-024-02330-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.