IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v36y2025i2d10.1007_s10845-023-02296-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automated porosity segmentation in laser powder bed fusion part using computed tomography: a validity study

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Desrosiers

    (École Polytechnique de Montréal)

  • Morgan Letenneur

    (École de Technologie Supérieure)

  • Fabrice Bernier

    (Centre National de Recherche du Canada)

  • Nicolas Piché

    (Comet Technologies Canada Inc.)

  • Benjamin Provencher

    (Comet Technologies Canada Inc.)

  • Farida Cheriet

    (École Polytechnique de Montréal)

  • François Guibault

    (École Polytechnique de Montréal)

  • Vladimir Brailovski

    (École de Technologie Supérieure)

Abstract

Defect detection in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) parts is a critical step for in their quality control. Ensuring the integrity of these parts is essential for a broader adoption of this manufacturing process in highly standardized industries such as aerospace. With many challenges to overcome, there is currently no standardized image analysis and segmentation process for the defect analysis of LPBF parts. This process is often manual and operator-dependent, which limits the repeatability and the reproducibility of the analytical methods applied, raising questions about the validity of the analysis. The pore segmentation step is critical for porosity analysis since the pore size and morphology metrics are calculated directly from the results of the segmentation process. In this work, Ti6Al4V specimens with purposely induced and controlled porosity were printed, scanned 5 times on two CT scan systems by two different operators, and then reconstructed as 3D volumes. The porosity in these specimens was analyzed using manual and Otsu thresholding and a convolutional neural network (CNN) deep learning segmentation algorithm. Then, a variance component estimation realized over 75 porosity analyses indicated that, independently of the operator and the CT scan system used, the CNN provided the best repeatability and reproducibility in the LPBF specimens of this study. Finally, a multimodal correlative study using higher resolution laser confocal microscopy observations was used for a multi-scale pore-to-pore comparison and as a reliability assessment of the segmentation algorithms. The validity of the CNN-based pore segmentation was thus assessed through improved repeatability, reproducibility, and reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Desrosiers & Morgan Letenneur & Fabrice Bernier & Nicolas Piché & Benjamin Provencher & Farida Cheriet & François Guibault & Vladimir Brailovski, 2025. "Automated porosity segmentation in laser powder bed fusion part using computed tomography: a validity study," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1341-1361, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02296-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-023-02296-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-023-02296-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-023-02296-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02296-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.