IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v36y2025i2d10.1007_s10845-023-02278-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic comparison of software agents and Digital Twins: differences, similarities, and synergies in industrial production

Author

Listed:
  • Lasse M. Reinpold

    (Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces)

  • Lukas P. Wagner

    (Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces)

  • Felix Gehlhoff

    (Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces)

  • Malte Ramonat

    (Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces)

  • Maximilian Kilthau

    (Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces)

  • Milapji S. Gill

    (Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces)

  • Jonathan T. Reif

    (Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces)

  • Vincent Henkel

    (Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces)

  • Lena Scholz

    (Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces)

  • Alexander Fay

    (Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces)

Abstract

To achieve a highly agile and flexible production, a transformational shift is envisioned whereby industrial production systems evolve to be more decentralized, interconnected, and intelligent. Within this vision, production assets collaborate with each other, exhibiting a high degree of autonomy. Furthermore, information about individual production assets is accessible throughout their entire life-cycles. To realize this vision, the use of advanced information technology is required. Two commonly applied software paradigms in this context are Software Agents (referred to as Agents) and Digital Twins (DTs). This work presents a systematic comparison of Agents and DTs in industrial applications. The goal of the study is to determine the differences, similarities, and potential synergies between the two paradigms. The comparison is based on the purposes for which Agents and DTs are applied, the properties and capabilities exhibited by these software paradigms, and how they can be allocated within the Reference Architecture Model Industry 4.0. The comparison reveals that Agents are commonly employed in the collaborative planning and execution of production processes, while DTs are generally more applied to monitor production resources and process information. Although these observations imply characteristic sets of capabilities and properties for both Agents and DTs, a clear and definitive distinction between the two paradigms cannot be made. Instead, the analysis indicates that production assets utilizing a combination of Agents and DTs would demonstrate high degrees of intelligence, autonomy, sociability, and fidelity. To achieve this, further standardization is required, particularly in the field of DTs.

Suggested Citation

  • Lasse M. Reinpold & Lukas P. Wagner & Felix Gehlhoff & Malte Ramonat & Maximilian Kilthau & Milapji S. Gill & Jonathan T. Reif & Vincent Henkel & Lena Scholz & Alexander Fay, 2025. "Systematic comparison of software agents and Digital Twins: differences, similarities, and synergies in industrial production," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 765-800, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02278-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-023-02278-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-023-02278-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-023-02278-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:36:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02278-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.