IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v33y2022i5d10.1007_s10845-020-01719-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematization of experts knowledge: example of part orientation in additive manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Mouhamadou Mansour Mbow

    (CNRS, Grenoble INP)

  • Christelle Grandvallet

    (CNRS, Grenoble INP)

  • Frederic Vignat

    (CNRS, Grenoble INP)

  • Philippe Rene Marin

    (CNRS, Grenoble INP)

  • Nicolas Perry

    (Arts et Métiers, I2M)

  • Franck Pourroy

    (CNRS, Grenoble INP)

Abstract

The use of expert knowledge by manufacturing companies to support everyday activities has become an emerging practice thanks to the new knowledge management tools. A big set of knowledge is available in the organizations but its profitable use to solve problems and assist decision making is still a challenge. This is the case of CAM operations or preprocessing steps for which various works have been led to involve experts’ knowledge in the decision-making based on qualitative principles. However, so far, there is no methodology to the quantitative representation of that knowledge for more assistance. This paper introduces an approach for the conversion of knowledge into quantitative mathematical models. The main idea is to go from elicitation data in the form of action rules to simple unitary mathematical images; here desirability functions. The whole process carried out to extract the useful information that help building the desirability functions is exposed and different useful mathematical considerations are proposed. The resulting methodology identifies the categories of concepts in action rules and translate them into codified action rules. Then, through a mathematization process, the desirability functions are built. In short, this new approach allows evaluating the satisfaction level of the rules prescribed by the experts. As an illustration, the model is applied to action rules for CAM operations in additive manufacturing and more precisely to the definition of part orientation. This has shown the robustness of the methodology used and that it is possible to translate elicitation data into mathematical functions operable in computation algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Mouhamadou Mansour Mbow & Christelle Grandvallet & Frederic Vignat & Philippe Rene Marin & Nicolas Perry & Franck Pourroy, 2022. "Mathematization of experts knowledge: example of part orientation in additive manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1209-1227, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:33:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01719-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01719-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-020-01719-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-020-01719-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heike Trautmann & Claus Weihs, 2006. "On the distribution of the desirability index using Harrington’s desirability function," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 207-213, April.
    2. Abbas Al-Refaie & Wafa’a Al-Alaween & Ali Diabat & Ming-Hsien Li, 2017. "Solving dynamic systems with multi-responses by integrating desirability function and data envelopment analysis," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 387-403, February.
    3. Ikujiro Nonaka & Georg von Krogh, 2009. "Perspective---Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 635-652, June.
    4. Kai-Qing Zhou & Li-Ping Mo & Jie Jin & Azlan Mohd Zain, 2019. "An equivalent generating algorithm to model fuzzy Petri net for knowledge-based system," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1831-1842, April.
    5. Yuchu Qin & Qunfen Qi & Paul J. Scott & Xiangqian Jiang, 2019. "Determination of optimal build orientation for additive manufacturing using Muirhead mean and prioritised average operators," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 3015-3034, December.
    6. Kwang‐Jae Kim & Dennis K. J. Lin, 2000. "Simultaneous optimization of mechanical properties of steel by maximizing exponential desirability functions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 49(3), pages 311-325.
    7. Yicha Zhang & Alain Bernard & Ramy Harik & K. P. Karunakaran, 2017. "Build orientation optimization for multi-part production in additive manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1393-1407, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yizhe Yang & Bingshan Liu & Haochen Li & Xin Li & Xiaodong Liu & Gong Wang, 2023. "Automatic selection system of the building orientation based on double-layer priority aggregation multi-attribute decision-making," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 2477-2493, June.
    2. Jose M. Framinan & Paz Perez-Gonzalez & Victor Fernandez-Viagas, 2023. "An overview on the use of operations research in additive manufacturing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(1), pages 5-40, March.
    3. Bera, Sasadhar & Mukherjee, Indrajit, 2016. "A multistage and multiple response optimization approach for serial manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 444-452.
    4. Lirios Alos-Simo & Antonio J. Verdu-Jover & Jose M. Gomez-Gras, 2020. "Knowledge Transfer in Sustainable Contexts: A Comparative Analysis of Periods of Financial Recession and Expansion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    6. Giovana Escrivão & Marcelo Seido Nagano, 2016. "Linking Knowledge Creation and Environmental Education," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Kawai, Norifumi & Chung, Chul, 2019. "Expatriate utilization, subsidiary knowledge creation and performance: The moderating role of subsidiary strategic context," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 24-36.
    8. Sung Hyo Hong, 2021. "Determinants of Selection of R&D Cooperation Partners: Insights from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-11, August.
    9. Mário Franco & Lurdes Esteves & Margarida Rodrigues, 2024. "Clusters as a Mechanism of Sharing Knowledge and Innovation: Case Study from a Network Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2), pages 377-400, April.
    10. Zhanna A. Mingaleva & Lyudmila N. Deputatova & Nikolay B. Akatov & Yurii V. Starkov & Elena Mitrofanova, 2019. "Application of HADI-cycle for providing sustainability of processes of knowledge and innovation," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 1628-1640, December.
    11. Shan, Wei & Qiao, Tong & Zhang, Mingli, 2020. "Getting more resources for better performance: The effect of user-owned resources on the value of user-generated content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Deist, Maximilian K. & McDowell, William C. & Bouncken, Ricarda B., 2023. "Digital units and digital innovation: Balancing fluidity and stability for the Creation, Conversion, and Dissemination of sticky knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    13. Ngoc Thach Pham & Anh Duc Do & Quang Vinh Nguyen & Van Loi Ta & Thi Thanh Binh Dao & Dieu Linh Ha & Xuan Truong Hoang, 2021. "Research on Knowledge Management Models at Universities Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.
    15. Wei-Shong Lin & Jui-Ling Huang & Margaret L. Sheng, 2014. "How the Organizational Goals Affect Knowledge Management," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia, vol. 3(1), pages 3-22.
    16. Muhammad Jahanzaib Yousaf & Qamar Ali, 2018. "Impact of Knowledge Management on Innovation: Evidence from a South Asian Country," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Raed A.I. Abueed & Mehmet Aga, 2019. "Sustainable Knowledge Creation and Corporate Outcomes: Does Corporate Data Governance Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Pedota, Mattia & Cicala, Francesco & Basti, Alessio, 2024. "A Wild Mind with a Disciplined Eye: Unleashing Human-GenAI Creativity Through Simulated Entity Elicitation," OSF Preprints 3bn95, Center for Open Science.
    19. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    20. Paul L. Goethals & Natalie M. Scala, 2018. "Eliminating the Weakest Link Approach to Army Unit Readiness," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 110-130, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:33:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01719-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.