IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v29y2018i1d10.1007_s10845-015-1090-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cluster analysis and neural network-based metamodeling of priority rules for dynamic sequencing

Author

Listed:
  • A. S. Xanthopoulos

    (Democritus University of Thrace)

  • D. E. Koulouriotis

    (Democritus University of Thrace)

Abstract

Most sequencing problems deal with deterministic environments where all information is known in advance. However, in real-world problems multiple sources of uncertainty need to be taken into consideration. To model such a situation, in this article, a dynamic sequencing problem with random arrivals, processing times and due-dates is considered. The examined system is a manufacturing line with multiple job classes and sequence-dependent setups. The performance of the system is measured under the metrics of mean WIP, mean cycle time, mean earliness, mean tardiness, mean absolute lateness, and mean percentage of tardy jobs. Twelve job dispatching rules for solving this problem are considered and evaluated via simulation experiments. A statistically rigorous analysis of the solution approaches is carried out with the use of unsupervised and supervised learning methods. The cluster analysis of the experimental results identified classes of priority rules based on their observed performance. The characteristics of each priority rule class are documented and areas in objective space not covered by existing rules are identified. The functional relationship between sequencing priority rules and performance metrics of the production system was approximated by artificial neural networks. Apart from gaining insight into the mechanics of the sequencing approaches the results of this article can be used (1) as a component for prediction systems of dispatching rule output, (2) as a guideline for building new dispatching heuristic with entirely different characteristics than existing ones, (3) to significantly decrease the length of what-if simulation studies.

Suggested Citation

  • A. S. Xanthopoulos & D. E. Koulouriotis, 2018. "Cluster analysis and neural network-based metamodeling of priority rules for dynamic sequencing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 69-91, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1090-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-015-1090-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-015-1090-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-015-1090-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandros S. Xanthopoulos & Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis, 2012. "Comparing heuristic and evolutionary approaches for minimising the number of tardy jobs and maximum earliness on a single machine," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 178-188.
    2. Olafsson, Sigurdur & Li, Xiaonan, 2010. "Learning effective new single machine dispatching rules from optimal scheduling data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 118-126, November.
    3. Chen, Binchao & Matis, Timothy I., 2013. "A flexible dispatching rule for minimizing tardiness in job shop scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 360-365.
    4. Branke, Juergen & Pickardt, Christoph W., 2011. "Evolutionary search for difficult problem instances to support the design of job shop dispatching rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 22-32, July.
    5. Vinod, V. & Sridharan, R., 2011. "Simulation modeling and analysis of due-date assignment methods and scheduling decision rules in a dynamic job shop production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 127-146, January.
    6. Jayamohan, M. S. & Rajendran, Chandrasekharan, 2004. "Development and analysis of cost-based dispatching rules for job shop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 307-321, September.
    7. Rajendran, Chandrasekharan & Holthaus, Oliver, 1999. "A comparative study of dispatching rules in dynamic flowshops and jobshops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 156-170, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mert Edali & Gönenç Yücel, 2020. "Analysis of an individual‐based influenza epidemic model using random forest metamodels and adaptive sequential sampling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 936-958, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiong, Hegen & Fan, Huali & Jiang, Guozhang & Li, Gongfa, 2017. "A simulation-based study of dispatching rules in a dynamic job shop scheduling problem with batch release and extended technical precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 13-24.
    2. Tanja Mlinar & Philippe Chevalier, 2016. "Pooling heterogeneous products for manufacturing environments," 4OR, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 173-200, June.
    3. Ferreira, Cristiane & Figueira, Gonçalo & Amorim, Pedro, 2022. "Effective and interpretable dispatching rules for dynamic job shops via guided empirical learning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Mohamed Habib Zahmani & Baghdad Atmani, 2021. "Multiple dispatching rules allocation in real time using data mining, genetic algorithms, and simulation," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 175-196, April.
    5. Helga Ingimundardottir & Thomas Philip Runarsson, 2018. "Discovering dispatching rules from data using imitation learning: A case study for the job-shop problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 413-428, August.
    6. Yao, Shiqing & Jiang, Zhibin & Li, Na & Zhang, Huai & Geng, Na, 2011. "A multi-objective dynamic scheduling approach using multiple attribute decision making in semiconductor manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 125-133, March.
    7. Pickardt, Christoph W. & Hildebrandt, Torsten & Branke, Jürgen & Heger, Jens & Scholz-Reiter, Bernd, 2013. "Evolutionary generation of dispatching rule sets for complex dynamic scheduling problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 67-77.
    8. Hübl, Alexander & Jodlbauer, Herbert & Altendorfer, Klaus, 2013. "Influence of dispatching rules on average production lead time for multi-stage production systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 479-484.
    9. Mallor, Fermin & Guardiola, Ivan G., 2014. "The Weibull scheduling index for client driven manufacturing processes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 225-238.
    10. Anurag Agarwal & Varghese S. Jacob & Hasan Pirkul, 2006. "An Improved Augmented Neural-Network Approach for Scheduling Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 119-128, February.
    11. Chuang Wang & Pingyu Jiang, 2019. "Deep neural networks based order completion time prediction by using real-time job shop RFID data," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1303-1318, March.
    12. Jiang, Min & Huang, George Q., 2022. "Intralogistics synchronization in robotic forward-reserve warehouses for e-commerce last-mile delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Öner-Közen, Miray & Minner, Stefan, 2017. "Impact of priority sequencing decisions on on-time probability and expected tardiness of orders in make-to-order production systems with external due-dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 524-539.
    14. Yang, Taho & Kuo, Yiyo & Cho, Chiwoon, 2007. "A genetic algorithms simulation approach for the multi-attribute combinatorial dispatching decision problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1859-1873, February.
    15. Azaron, Amir & Katagiri, Hideki & Kato, Kosuke & Sakawa, Masatoshi, 2006. "Longest path analysis in networks of queues: Dynamic scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 132-149, October.
    16. Al-Hinai, Nasr & ElMekkawy, T.Y., 2011. "Robust and stable flexible job shop scheduling with random machine breakdowns using a hybrid genetic algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 279-291, August.
    17. Gabriel Mauricio Zambrano-Rey & Eliana María González-Neira & Gabriel Fernando Forero-Ortiz & María José Ocampo-Monsalve & Andrea Rivera-Torres, 2024. "Minimizing the expected maximum lateness for a job shop subject to stochastic machine breakdowns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 801-833, July.
    18. Zhang, Rui & Song, Shiji & Wu, Cheng, 2013. "A hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for the job shop scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 167-178.
    19. Branke, Juergen & Pickardt, Christoph W., 2011. "Evolutionary search for difficult problem instances to support the design of job shop dispatching rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 22-32, July.
    20. Petroni, Alberto & Rizzi, Antonio, 2002. "A fuzzy logic based methodology to rank shop floor dispatching rules," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 99-108, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1090-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.