IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joecth/v8y1996i3p565-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coalitional Instability of the Distributive Lindahl Equilibrium

Author

Listed:
  • Asdrubali, Pierfederico

Abstract

Bergstron has shown that the Lindahlian approach to the analysis of public goods may also be used to analyze a model of widespread externalities in which agents have preferences defined on allocations rather than on individual commodity bundles. He has provided versions of the first and second welfare theorem for a distributive Lindahl equilibrium and also presented sufficient conditions for its existence. However, we shall show that, in contrast to Foley's result on the core stability of a Lindahl equilibrium, a distributive Lindahl equilibrium need not satisfy coalitional stability. We will provide a robust example in which the unique, distributive Lindahl equilibrium does not belong to the alpha-core defined either as in Scarf or as in Yannelis.

Suggested Citation

  • Asdrubali, Pierfederico, 1996. "Coalitional Instability of the Distributive Lindahl Equilibrium," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 8(3), pages 565-575, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joecth:v:8:y:1996:i:3:p:565-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Pietro & Maria Gabriella Graziano & Vincenzo Platino, 2022. "Social loss with respect to the core of an economy with externalities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 73(2), pages 487-508, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joecth:v:8:y:1996:i:3:p:565-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.