IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jlabrs/v59y2025i1d10.1186_s12651-025-00392-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does organizational context matter? An examination of the factors influencing employees’ judgments of minimum wage increases

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Dütsch

    (Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA)
    Otto-Friedrich University of Bamberg)

  • Monika Senghaas

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB))

  • Gesine Stephan

    (Institute for Employment Research (IAB)
    Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg)

  • Olaf Struck

    (Otto-Friedrich University of Bamberg)

Abstract

This article presents novel findings on company factors that determine judgments regarding the fairness of minimum wage increases. Drawing on minimum wage and organizational justice research, we conducted a factorial survey among German employees. It seems that the internal wage structure plays a crucial role because raising only the pay of minimum wage workers and not that of other employees causes a minimum wage increase to be rated as less fair. While a hiring freeze does not negatively influence fairness judgments, layoffs do. Finally, if a minimum wage increase adversely affects a company’s economic situation, respondents assess it as less fair.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Dütsch & Monika Senghaas & Gesine Stephan & Olaf Struck, 2025. "Does organizational context matter? An examination of the factors influencing employees’ judgments of minimum wage increases," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 59(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jlabrs:v:59:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s12651-025-00392-3
    DOI: 10.1186/s12651-025-00392-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12651-025-00392-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s12651-025-00392-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Distributive justice; Fairness judgment; Minimum wage; Factorial survey;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jlabrs:v:59:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s12651-025-00392-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.