IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v15y2024i4d10.1007_s13132-024-01755-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Media Knowledge Capabilities of Intelligent Search Dialogue Systems: A Case Study of ChatGPT and New Bing

Author

Listed:
  • Li-Yuan Huang

    (Wuhan Technology and Business University)

  • Xun Zhang

    (Beijing Qingbo Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.)

  • Qiang Wang

    (Wuhan University)

  • Zhen-Song Chen

    (Wuhan University)

  • Yang Liu

    (ZhongNan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University)

Abstract

This study establishes an index system for evaluating the media knowledge capabilities of intelligent search dialogue systems (ISDS), which includes three primary indicators: dialogue ability, special ability, and output value. Survey data from relevant users are used to analyze the reliability and validity of the index system. An empirical comparison indicates that ChatGPT outperforms New Bing in understanding and dialogue capabilities, whereas New Bing excels in output content value. This paper also proposes new dimensions for ISDS, emphasizing their positive impact on knowledge production and dissemination. Nonetheless, ISDS also pose a series of risks and problems, including data privacy leaks and ethical challenges, which urgently need researching and addressing.

Suggested Citation

  • Li-Yuan Huang & Xun Zhang & Qiang Wang & Zhen-Song Chen & Yang Liu, 2024. "Evaluating Media Knowledge Capabilities of Intelligent Search Dialogue Systems: A Case Study of ChatGPT and New Bing," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 17284-17307, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-024-01755-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-01755-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-024-01755-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-024-01755-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s13132-024-01755-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.