IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jhappi/v26y2025i3d10.1007_s10902-025-00874-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Relative Consumption Deprivation Influence Subjective Well-Being? The Moderating Role of Housing Wealth

Author

Listed:
  • Junhua Chen

    (Central University of Finance and Economics)

  • Na Liu

    (Central University of Finance and Economics)

  • Shufan Ma

    (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Exploring the relation between inequality and subjective well-being is an enduring topic in happiness economics. However, less attention has been paid to clarifying the relation from the perspective of micro-level consumption inequality among households. A household often focuses more on its relative consumption status than overall consumption inequality by comparing its own consumption with that of other households with higher consumption levels in the reference group. This upward comparison results in relative consumption deprivation. Using data from the 2019 China Household Finance Survey, the relation between relative consumption deprivation and household subjective well-being and the moderating role of housing wealth are investigated in this study. The results reveal a negative association between relative consumption deprivation and subjective well-being, with the relative deprivation of subsistence consumption being more closely related to reduced subjective well-being than that of developmental consumption. Moreover, this association exhibits an inverted U-shaped pattern with increasing housing wealth, implying that relative consumption deprivation is more negatively associated with the subjective well-being of households with either relatively low or high levels of housing wealth, while for other households, the inverse association is weaker. The heterogeneity tests indicate that relative consumption deprivation has stronger negative associations with the subjective well-being of households with larger sizes, experiencing economic deterioration, or residing in first-tier and second-tier cities. Further analyses show that when households are facing an upward trend in housing prices, the linkage between relative consumption deprivation and the loss of subjective well-being is stronger in households without dwellings than in those with dwellings.

Suggested Citation

  • Junhua Chen & Na Liu & Shufan Ma, 2025. "How Does Relative Consumption Deprivation Influence Subjective Well-Being? The Moderating Role of Housing Wealth," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1-31, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:26:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10902-025-00874-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10902-025-00874-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10902-025-00874-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10902-025-00874-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Relative consumption deprivation; Subjective well-being; Housing wealth; Consumption inequality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:26:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10902-025-00874-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.