IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jhappi/v25y2024i8d10.1007_s10902-024-00826-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Individual-Based Hybrid Well-Being Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Sangmu Oh

    (Korea University)

Abstract

This paper advances an individual-based hybrid well-being theory and argues that it is able to overcome the main drawbacks of existing objective list theories and avoid the shortcomings of hedonism and desire-fulfillment theories. The individual-based hybrid well-being theory has characteristics of perfectionist objective theories in that it recognizes objective goods and explains the commonality of goods from the perspective of perfectionism, but it also differs from existing objective list theories insofar as it provides not a single list of goods for everyone but plural lists of goods based on each individual for each individual. In addition, it represents a hybrid theory rather than a pure objective list theory because it recognizes the individual’s desire as a factor influencing the contribution of objective goods to well-being and the individual’s experiences of pleasure as a component of well-being outside the list of goods.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangmu Oh, 2024. "An Individual-Based Hybrid Well-Being Theory," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:25:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s10902-024-00826-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10902-024-00826-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10902-024-00826-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10902-024-00826-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martha C. Nussbaum, 1987. "Nature, Function and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1987-031, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Yelle, Benjamin, 2014. "Alienation, Deprivation, and the Well-being of Persons," Utilitas, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(4), pages 367-384, December.
    3. Fletcher, Guy, 2013. "A Fresh Start for the Objective-List Theory of Well-Being," Utilitas, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 206-220, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bénédicte Gendron, 2024. "Capacitating Pedagogy to Inclusive Excellence through Bienvivance for Zero Waste of Human Resources: European Case Studies during the Lockdown on Vocational Education and Training," Merits, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Nadia von Jacobi, 2018. "Institutions as Meso-factors of Development: A Human Development Perspective," Journal of Contextual Economics (JCE) – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 138(1), pages 53-88.
    3. Ryan, Mark, 2022. "The ethics of dietary apps: Technology, health, and the capability approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Kana Zeumo, Vivien & Tsoukiàs, Alexis & Somé, Blaise, 2014. "A new methodology for multidimensional poverty measurement based on the capability approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 273-289.
    5. Vivien Kana Zeumo & Blaise Some & Alexis Tsoukiàs, 2011. "A survey on Multidimensional Poverty Measurement: a Decision Aiding Perspective," Working Papers hal-00875525, HAL.
    6. Tomasz Kwarciński, 2016. "Theories of well-being and interpersonal comparability," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 45.
    7. Sabrina Intelisano & Julia Krasko & Maike Luhmann, 2020. "Integrating Philosophical and Psychological Accounts of Happiness and Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 161-200, January.
    8. Frank Martela, 2023. "The Normative Value of Making a Positive Contribution–Benefiting Others as a Core Dimension of Meaningful Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(4), pages 811-823, July.
    9. Bao, Yan Xi & Liao, Ting Xuan, 2021. "Capability Approach: Reconciling the Absolute Core and the Multidimensional Relative Poverty Measures," MPRA Paper 111333, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. James L. D. Brown & Sophie Potter, 2024. "Integrating the Philosophy and Psychology of Well-Being: An Opinionated Overview," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1-28, June.
    11. Polly Mitchell & Anna Alexandrova, 2021. "Well-Being and Pluralism," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 2411-2433, August.
    12. Yalu Zhang & Qin Gao & Fuhua Zhai & Paul Anand, 2023. "Income and Health in Predicting Older Adults’ Social Capabilities in China: The Mediating Role of Social Engagement," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 163-180, January.
    13. Mehta, Lyla, 2014. "Water and Human Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 59-69.
    14. Vivien Kana Zeumo & Alexis Tsoukiàs & Blaise Some, 2012. "A new methodology for multidimensional poverty measurement based on the capability approach," Working Papers hal-00874627, HAL.
    15. Vivien Kana-Zeumo & Alexis Tsoukiàs & Blaise Somé, 2014. "A new methodology for multidimensional poverty measurement based on the capability approach," Post-Print hal-01510900, HAL.
    16. Tessa Peasgood & Clara Mukuria & Jill Carlton & Janice Connell & Nancy Devlin & Karen Jones & Rosemary Lovett & Bhash Naidoo & Stacey Rand & Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla & Donna Rowen & Aki Tsuchiya & J, 2021. "What is the best approach to adopt for identifying the domains for a new measure of health, social care and carer-related quality of life to measure quality-adjusted life years? Application to the dev," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(7), pages 1067-1081, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:25:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s10902-024-00826-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.