IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jecrev/v75y2024i1d10.1007_s42973-022-00123-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing behavior between a large sample of smart students and Japanese adults

Author

Listed:
  • Nobuyuki Hanaki

    (Osaka University)

  • Keigo Inukai

    (Meiji Gakuin University)

  • Takehito Masuda

    (Shinshu University)

  • Yuta Shimodaira

    (Osaka University)

Abstract

We address a concern about the external validity of an experiment conducted with university students related to the representativeness of the sampled population in particular. We do so by conducting large-scale (partly) incentivized online surveys of students at a Japanese university and of a sample of Japanese adults to measure individual characteristics such as cognitive ability, mentalizing skills, preferences for risk and distribution, and personality traits. While significant differences between these two samples are observed in many of these characteristics, the correlational structures among these characteristics are very similar in the two samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Nobuyuki Hanaki & Keigo Inukai & Takehito Masuda & Yuta Shimodaira, 2024. "Comparing behavior between a large sample of smart students and Japanese adults," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 29-67, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jecrev:v:75:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s42973-022-00123-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s42973-022-00123-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42973-022-00123-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42973-022-00123-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jecrev:v:75:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s42973-022-00123-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.