IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v32y2016i1d10.1007_s10878-015-9891-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performances of pure random walk algorithms on constraint satisfaction problems with growing domains

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Xu

    (Beihang University)

  • Fuzhou Gong

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

The performances of two types of pure random walk (PRW) algorithms for a model of constraint satisfaction problem with growing domains (called Model RB) are investigated. Threshold phenomenons appear for both algorithms. In particular, when the constraint density $$r$$ r is smaller than a threshold value $$r_d$$ r d , PRW algorithms can solve instances of Model RB efficiently, but when $$r$$ r is bigger than the $$r_d$$ r d , they fail. Using a physical method, we find out the threshold values for both algorithms. When the number of variables $$N$$ N is large, the threshold values tend to zero, so generally speaking PRW does not work on Model RB. By performing experiments, we show that PRW strategy cannot do better than other fundamental strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Xu & Fuzhou Gong, 2016. "Performances of pure random walk algorithms on constraint satisfaction problems with growing domains," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 51-66, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:32:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-015-9891-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-015-9891-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-015-9891-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-015-9891-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:32:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s10878-015-9891-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.