IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v13y2007i3d10.1007_s10878-006-9031-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient algorithms for finding a longest common increasing subsequence

Author

Listed:
  • Wun-Tat Chan

    (University of Hong Kong)

  • Yong Zhang

    (University of Hong Kong)

  • Stanley P. Y. Fung

    (University of Leicester)

  • Deshi Ye

    (University of Hong Kong)

  • Hong Zhu

    (Fudan University)

Abstract

We study the problem of finding a longest common increasing subsequence (LCIS) of multiple sequences of numbers. The LCIS problem is a fundamental issue in various application areas, including the whole genome alignment. In this paper we give an efficient algorithm to find the LCIS of two sequences in $$O({\rm min}(r {\rm log} \ell, n \ell +r) {\rm log} {\rm log} n + Sort(n))$$ time where n is the length of each sequence andr is the number of ordered pairs of positions at which the two sequences match, ℓ is the length of the LCIS, and Sort(n) is the time to sort n numbers. For m sequences wherem ≥ 3, we find the LCIS in $$O({\rm min}(mr^2, r {\rm log}\ell {\rm log}^m r)+m\cdot $$ Sort(n)) time where r is the total number of m-tuples of positions at which the m sequences match. The previous results find the LCIS of two sequences in O(n 2) and $$O(n\ell {\rm log} {\rm log} n+$$ Sort(n)) time. Our algorithm is faster when r is relatively small, e.g., for $$r

Suggested Citation

  • Wun-Tat Chan & Yong Zhang & Stanley P. Y. Fung & Deshi Ye & Hong Zhu, 2007. "Efficient algorithms for finding a longest common increasing subsequence," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 277-288, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:13:y:2007:i:3:d:10.1007_s10878-006-9031-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-006-9031-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-006-9031-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-006-9031-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaozhou He & Yinfeng Xu, 2018. "The longest commonly positioned increasing subsequences problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 331-340, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:13:y:2007:i:3:d:10.1007_s10878-006-9031-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.