IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v13y2007i3d10.1007_s10878-006-9025-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fast algorithms for computing the tripartition-based distance between phylogenetic networks

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Bao Nguyen

    (National University of Singapore)

  • C. Thach Nguyen

    (National University of Singapore)

  • Wing-Kin Sung

    (National University of Singapore)

Abstract

Consider two phylogenetic networks $${\cal N}$$ and $${\cal N}$$ ’ of size n. The tripartition-based distance finds the proportion of tripartitions which are not shared by $${\cal N}$$ and $${\cal N}$$ ’. This distance is proposed by Moret et al. (2004) and is a generalization of Robinson-Foulds distance, which is orginally used to compare two phylogenetic trees. This paper gives an $$O(\min \{k n \log n, n \log n + hn\})$$ -time algorithm to compute this distance, where h is the number of hybrid nodes in $${\cal N}$$ and $${\cal N}$$ ’ while k is the maximum number of hybrid nodes among all biconnected components in $${\cal N}$$ and $${\cal N}$$ ’. Note that $k \ll h \ll n$ in a phylogenetic network. In addition, we propose algorithms for comparing galled-trees, which are an important, biological meaningful special case of phylogenetic network. We give an $O(n)$-time algorithm for comparing two galled-trees. We also give an $$O(n + kh)$$ -time algorithm for comparing a galled-tree with another general network, where h and k are the number of hybrid nodes in the latter network and its biggest biconnected component respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Bao Nguyen & C. Thach Nguyen & Wing-Kin Sung, 2007. "Fast algorithms for computing the tripartition-based distance between phylogenetic networks," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 223-242, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:13:y:2007:i:3:d:10.1007_s10878-006-9025-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-006-9025-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-006-9025-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-006-9025-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steven M Woolley & David Posada & Keith A Crandall, 2008. "A Comparison of Phylogenetic Network Methods Using Computer Simulation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(4), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:13:y:2007:i:3:d:10.1007_s10878-006-9025-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.