Comparison of classifications using measures intermediate between metric dissimilarity and consensus similarity
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1007/BF01894190
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Day, William H. E., 1981. "The complexity of computing metric distances between partitions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 269-287, May.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- François-Joseph Lapointe & Pierre Legendre, 1991. "The generation of random ultrametric matrices representing dendrograms," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 8(2), pages 177-200, December.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Peter Davison & Bruce Cameron & Edward F. Crawley, 2015. "Technology Portfolio Planning by Weighted Graph Analysis of System Architectures," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 45-58, January.
- Podani János & Engloner Attila & Major Agnes, 2009. "Multilevel Comparison of Dendrograms: A New Method with an Application for Genetic Classifications," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, April.
- Edward Brown & William Day, 1984. "A computationally efficient approximation to the nearest neighbor interchange metric," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 1(1), pages 93-124, December.
- Alain Guénoche, 2011. "Consensus of partitions : a constructive approach," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 5(3), pages 215-229, October.
More about this item
Keywords
Classification; Comparison; Numerical taxonomy; Consensus; Intermediate sensitive measures; Partial orders; Stream basins; Inter-partition distance;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:3:y:1986:i:2:p:257-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.