IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/intere/v57y2022i4d10.1007_s10272-022-1057-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Financial Products in the EU — A Critical Review of the Status Quo

Author

Listed:
  • Volker Brühl

    (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt)

Abstract

The financial sector plays an important role in supporting the green transformation of the European economy. A critical assessment of the current regulatory framework for sustainable finance in Europe leads to ambiguous results. Although the level of transparency on environmental, social and governance aspects of financial products has improved significantly, it is questionable whether the complex, mainly disclosure-oriented architecture is sufficient to mobilise more private capital into sustainable investments. It should be discussed whether a minimum taxonomy ratio or Green Asset Ratio has to be fulfilled to market a financial product as “green”. Furthermore, because of the high complexity of the regulation, it could be helpful for private investors to establish a simplified green rating, based on the taxonomy ratio, to facilitate the selection of green financial products.

Suggested Citation

  • Volker Brühl, 2022. "Green Financial Products in the EU — A Critical Review of the Status Quo," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 57(4), pages 252-259, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:intere:v:57:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10272-022-1057-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10272-022-1057-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10272-022-1057-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10272-022-1057-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romain Berrou & Philippe Dessertine & Marco Migliorelli, 2019. "An Overview of Green Finance," Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance, in: Marco Migliorelli & Philippe Dessertine (ed.), The Rise of Green Finance in Europe, chapter 0, pages 3-29, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Xunfa & Huang, Nan & Mo, Jianlei & Ye, Zhitao, 2023. "Dynamics of the return and volatility connectedness among green finance markets during the COVID-19 pandemic," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    2. Alessi, Lucia & Battiston, Stefano, 2022. "Two sides of the same coin: Green Taxonomy alignment versus transition risk in financial portfolios," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Paola D'Orazio & Lilit Popoyan, 2020. "Taking up the climate change challenge: a new perspective on central banking," LEM Papers Series 2020/19, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    4. Liu, Yang & Zhao, Xiaomeng & Dong, Kangyin & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2023. "Assessing the role of green finance in sustainable energy investments by power utilities: Evidence from China," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    5. Alessi, Lucia & Battiston, Stefano, 2021. "Two sides of the same coin: Green Taxonomy alignment versus transition risk in financial portfolios," JRC Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2021-14, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
    6. Goshu Desalegn & Anita Tangl, 2022. "Developing Countries in the Lead: A Bibliometric Approach to Green Finance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Ewa Dziwok & Johannes Jäger, 2021. "A Classification of Different Approaches to Green Finance and Green Monetary Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Sun, Huaping & Tariq, Gulzara & Youn, Ik Joong & Mansoor, Sofia, 2022. "Impacts of green energy finance on eco-friendly environments," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Pan, Changchun & Yu, Jingxia & Huang, Yuzhe & Altuntas, Sumeyya, 2023. "The dynamic relationship between resources, finances, and sustainable development: An in-depth analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    10. Ade Banani & Bambang Sunarko, 2022. "Nexus between Green Finance, Creativity, Energy Accounting and Financial Performance: Banks Sustainability Analysis from Developing Country," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(6), pages 447-455, November.
    11. Hou, Yan & Li, Xiaobo & Wang, Hui & Yunusova, Rimma, 2024. "Focusing on energy efficiency: The convergence of green financing, FinTech, financial inclusion, and natural resource rents for a greener Asia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Yang, Yuxue & Su, Xiang & Yao, Shuangliang, 2021. "Nexus between green finance, fintech, and high-quality economic development: Empirical evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    13. Zhizhong Liu & Shuchi Zheng & Xinyu Zhang & Long Mo, 2023. "The Impact of Green Finance on Export Technology Complexity: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Arilla-Llorente, Ramon & Gavurova, Beata & Rigelsky, Martin & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2024. "Quantifying the dynamics of relationships between eco-innovations and SDG 8," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    15. He, Wenhua & Liu, Pei & Lin, Borong & Zhou, Hao & Chen, Xuesheng, 2022. "Green finance support for development of green buildings in China: Effect, mechanism, and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    16. Volker Brühl, 2021. "Green Finance in Europe — Strategy, Regulation and Instruments," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 56(6), pages 323-330, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    G10; G20;

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:intere:v:57:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10272-022-1057-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.