IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v26y2024i2d10.1007_s10796-021-10222-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Confirmation Bias View on Social Media Induced Polarisation During Covid-19

Author

Listed:
  • Sachin Modgil

    (International Management Institute (IMI) Kolkata)

  • Rohit Kumar Singh

    (International Management Institute (IMI) Kolkata)

  • Shivam Gupta

    (NEOMA Business School)

  • Denis Dennehy

    (National University of Ireland Galway)

Abstract

Social media has played a pivotal role in polarising views on politics, climate change, and more recently, the Covid-19 pandemic. Social media induced polarisation (SMIP) poses serious challenges to society as it could enable ‘digital wildfires’ that can wreak havoc worldwide. While the effects of SMIP have been extensively studied, there is limited understanding of the interplay between two key components of this phenomenon: confirmation bias (reinforcing one’s attitudes and beliefs) and echo chambers (i.e., hear their own voice). This paper addresses this knowledge deficit by exploring how manifestations of confirmation bias contributed to the development of ‘echo chambers’ at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. Thematic analysis of data collected from 35 participants involved in supply chain information processing forms the basis of a conceptual model of SMIP and four key cross-cutting propositions emerging from the data that have implications for research and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Sachin Modgil & Rohit Kumar Singh & Shivam Gupta & Denis Dennehy, 2024. "A Confirmation Bias View on Social Media Induced Polarisation During Covid-19," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 417-441, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:26:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10796-021-10222-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-021-10222-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-021-10222-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-021-10222-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:26:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10796-021-10222-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.