IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v23y2021i4d10.1007_s10796-020-10088-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation of Misinformation Harms Related to Social Media during Two Humanitarian Crises

Author

Listed:
  • Thi Tran

    (The University of Texas at San Antonio)

  • Rohit Valecha

    (The University of Texas at San Antonio)

  • Paul Rad

    (The University of Texas at San Antonio)

  • H. Raghav Rao

    (The University of Texas at San Antonio)

Abstract

During humanitarian crises, a large amount of information is circulated in a short period of time, either to withstand or respond to such crises. Such crises also give rise to misinformation that spreads within and outside the affected community. Such misinformation may result in information harms that can generate serious short term or long-term consequences. In the context of humanitarian crises, we propose a synthesis of misinformation harms and assess people’s perception of harm based on their work experience in the crisis response arena or their direct exposure to crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi Tran & Rohit Valecha & Paul Rad & H. Raghav Rao, 2021. "An Investigation of Misinformation Harms Related to Social Media during Two Humanitarian Crises," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 931-939, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:23:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-020-10088-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-020-10088-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-020-10088-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-020-10088-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peretti-Watel, Patrick & Raude, Jocelyn & Sagaon-Teyssier, Luis & Constant, Aymery & Verger, Pierre & Beck, François, 2014. "Attitudes toward vaccination and the H1N1 vaccine: Poor people's unfounded fears or legitimate concerns of the elite?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 10-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiexun Li & Xiaohui Chang, 2023. "Combating Misinformation by Sharing the Truth: a Study on the Spread of Fact-Checks on Social Media," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1479-1493, August.
    2. Sanjay K. Sahay & Nihita Goel & Murtuza Jadliwala & Shambhu Upadhyaya, 2021. "Advances in Secure Knowledge Management in the Artificial Intelligence Era," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 807-810, August.
    3. Ahmed Abbasi & Robin Dillon & H. Raghav Rao & Olivia R. Liu Sheng, 2024. "Preparedness and Response in the Century of Disasters: Overview of Information Systems Research Frontiers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 460-468, June.
    4. Jithesh Arayankalam & Satish Krishnan, 2023. "ICT-Based Country-Level Determinants of Social Media Diffusion," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1881-1902, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghada El Khoury & Pascale Salameh, 2015. "Influenza Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Knowledge, Attitude and Practices among the Lebanese Adult Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Kay Fullenkamp, Natalie, 2021. "Playing Russian roulette with their kids: Experts' construction of ignorance in the California and Ohio measles outbreaks," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    3. Ward, Jeremy K., 2016. "Rethinking the antivaccine movement concept: A case study of public criticism of the swine flu vaccine’s safety in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 48-57.
    4. Seddig, Daniel & Maskileyson, Dina & Davidov, Eldad & Ajzen, Icek & Schmidt, Peter, 2022. "Correlates of COVID-19 vaccination intentions: Attitudes, institutional trust, fear, conspiracy beliefs, and vaccine skepticism," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    5. Jorien Veldwijk & Iris van der Heide & Jany Rademakers & A. Jantine Schuit & G. Ardine de Wit & Ellen Uiters & Mattijs S. Lambooij, 2015. "Preferences for Vaccination," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(8), pages 948-958, November.
    6. Ward, Jeremy K. & Gauna, Fatima & Deml, Michael J. & MacKendrick, Norah & Peretti-Watel, Patrick, 2023. "Diversity of attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and vaccines: A representative cross-sectional study in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    7. Makarovs, Kirils & Achterberg, Peter, 2017. "Contextualizing educational differences in “vaccination uptake”: A thirty nation survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Rhanye Mac Guad & Yuan Seng Wu & Yin Nwe Aung & Shamala Devi Sekaran & André Barretto Bruno Wilke & Wah Yun Low & Maw Shin Sim & Rogie Royce Carandang & Mohammad Saffree Jeffree & Hamed Taherdoost & C, 2021. "Different Domains of Dengue Research in Malaysia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Questionnaire-Based Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-30, April.
    9. Ward, Jeremy K. & Cafiero, Florian & Fretigny, Raphael & Colgrove, James & Seror, Valérie, 2019. "France's citizen consultation on vaccination and the challenges of participatory democracy in health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 73-80.
    10. Jean Louis Tavani & Anthony Piermattéo & Grégory Lo Monaco & Sylvain Delouvée, 2021. "Skepticism and defiance: Assessing credibility and representations of science," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:23:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-020-10088-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.