IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v14y2012i1d10.1007_s10796-011-9304-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protecting privacy during peer-to-peer exchange of medical documents

Author

Listed:
  • Jens H. Weber-Jahnke

    (University of Victoria)

  • Christina Obry

    (University of Victoria)

Abstract

Privacy is an important aspect of interoperable medical information systems. Governments and health care organizations have established privacy policies to prevent abuse of personal health data. These policies often require organizations to obtain patient consent prior to exchanging personal information with other interoperable systems. The consents are defined in form of so-called disclosure directives. However, policies are often not precise enough to address all possible eventualities and exceptions. Unanticipated priorities and other care contexts may cause conflicts between a patient’s disclosure directives and the need to receive treatments from informed caregivers. It is commonly agreed that in these situations patient safety takes precedence over information privacy. Therefore, caregivers are typically given the ability to override the patient’s disclosure directives to protect patient safety. These overrides must be logged and are subject to privacy audits to prevent abuse. Centralized “shared health record” (SHR) infrastructures include consent management systems that enact the above functionality. However, consent management mechanisms do not extend to information systems that exchange clinical information on a peer-to-peer basis, e.g., by secure messaging. Our article addresses this gap by presenting a consent management mechanism for peer-to-peer interoperable systems. The mechanism restricts access to sensitive, medical data based on defined consent directives, but also allows overriding the policies when needed. The overriding process is monitored and audited in order to prevent misuse. The mechanism has been implemented in an open source project called CDAShip and has been made available on SourceForge.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens H. Weber-Jahnke & Christina Obry, 2012. "Protecting privacy during peer-to-peer exchange of medical documents," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 87-104, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:14:y:2012:i:1:d:10.1007_s10796-011-9304-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-011-9304-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-011-9304-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-011-9304-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Henkenjohann, 2021. "Role of Individual Motivations and Privacy Concerns in the Adoption of German Electronic Patient Record Apps—A Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Jens Weber-Jahnke & Liam Peyton & Thodoros Topaloglou, 2012. "eHealth system interoperability," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-3, March.
    3. Grace Fox & Tabitha L. James, 2021. "Toward an Understanding of the Antecedents to Health Information Privacy Concern: A Mixed Methods Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 1537-1562, December.
    4. Chulhwan Chris Bang, 2015. "Information systems frontiers: Keyword analysis and classification," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 217-237, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:14:y:2012:i:1:d:10.1007_s10796-011-9304-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.