IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v11y2009i3d10.1007_s10796-008-9090-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of inter-organizational business process solutions: A conceptual model-based approach

Author

Listed:
  • Johny Ghattas

    (University of Haifa)

  • Pnina Soffer

    (University of Haifa)

Abstract

Collaboration and coordination between organizations are necessary in today’s business environment, and are enabled by inter-organizational processes. Many approaches for the construction of such processes have been proposed in recent years. However, due to the lack of standard terminology it is hard to evaluate and select a solution that fits a specific business scenario. The paper proposes a conceptual model which depicts the nature of interaction between organizations through business processes under specific business requirements that emphasize the privacy and autonomy of the participating organizations. The model is generic, and relies on the generic process model (GPM) framework and on Bunge’s ontology. Being generic and theory-based, we propose to use the model as a basis for comparing and evaluating design and implementation-level approaches for inter-organizational processes. We demonstrate the evaluation procedure by applying it to three existing approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Johny Ghattas & Pnina Soffer, 2009. "Evaluation of inter-organizational business process solutions: A conceptual model-based approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 273-291, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:11:y:2009:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-008-9090-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-008-9090-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-008-9090-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-008-9090-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. M. P. van der Aalst & Akhil Kumar, 2003. "XML–Based Schema Definition for Support of Interorganizational Workflow," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 23-46, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fang Fang & Manoj Parameswaran & Xia Zhao & Andrew B. Whinston, 2014. "An economic mechanism to manage operational security risks for inter-organizational information systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 399-416, July.
    2. Asef Pourmasoumi & Mohsen Kahani & Ebrahim Bagheri, 0. "Mining variable fragments from process event logs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    3. Asef Pourmasoumi & Mohsen Kahani & Ebrahim Bagheri, 2017. "Mining variable fragments from process event logs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 1423-1443, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roman Beck & Sven Weber & Robert Wayne Gregory, 2013. "Theory-generating design science research," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 637-651, September.
    2. Alex Norta & Rik Eshuis, 2010. "Specification and verification of harmonized business-process collaborations," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 457-479, September.
    3. Lucian Visinescu & Nicholas Evangelopoulos, 2024. "Designing adaptive feedback mechanisms with text mining capabilities: An illustration on eBay," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:11:y:2009:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-008-9090-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.