IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v8y2017i2d10.1007_s13198-017-0668-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective optimization and network security enhancement for congestion management in wholesale electricity market

Author

Listed:
  • Divya Asija

    (Amity University Uttar Pradesh)

  • K. M. Soni

    (Amity University Uttar Pradesh)

  • S. K. Sinha

    (Amity University Uttar Pradesh)

  • Vinod Kumar Yadav

    (Gautam Buddha University)

Abstract

This paper presents an effective approach for managing congestion in a power transmission system by optimally placing distributed generators at the load end. Congestion management involves multiple objectives such as elimination of congestion, minimum congestion cost and bus voltage limit violations. DG has been proved as viable source for removing the congestion problem of the transmission system. Optimal placement of DG has been done for decreasing locational marginal price, nodal congestion price thereby maximizing social welfare function and network security in deregulated power system. The multi-objective optimal power flow problem considered here is mainly for achieving balance between social welfare function and network security. Social welfare function relates with value of market which is the summation of producer and consumer surplus whereas network security relates mainly for security of transmission system. The proposed system lowers the overall price paid to market operators by assigning balanced weights to social welfare and network security enhancing the overall system performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Divya Asija & K. M. Soni & S. K. Sinha & Vinod Kumar Yadav, 2017. "Multi-objective optimization and network security enhancement for congestion management in wholesale electricity market," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1775-1782, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:8:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-017-0668-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-017-0668-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-017-0668-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-017-0668-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daganzo, Carlos F. & Lehe, Lewis J., 2015. "Distance-dependent congestion pricing for downtown zones," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 89-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mandhir Kumar Verma & Vivekananda Mukherjee & Vinod Kumar Yadav & Santosh Ghosh, 2020. "Constraints for effective distribution network expansion planning: an ample review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(3), pages 531-546, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qixiu Cheng & Zhiyuan Liu & Feifei Liu & Ruo Jia, 2017. "Urban dynamic congestion pricing: an overview and emerging research needs," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(0), pages 3-18, August.
    2. Daganzo, Carlos F & Lehe, Lewis, 2016. "Zone Pricing in Theory and Practice," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt39f0v6kq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Xijie Li & Ying Lv & Wei Sun & Li Zhou, 2019. "Cordon- or Link-Based Pricing: Environment-Oriented Toll Design Models Development and Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Richard Arnott & Anatolii Kokoza & Mehdi Naji, 2015. "A Model of Rush-Hour Traffic in an Isotropic Downtown Area," Working Papers 201511, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
    5. Bao, Yue & Verhoef, Erik T. & Koster, Paul, 2021. "Leaving the tub: The nature and dynamics of hypercongestion in a bathtub model with a restricted downstream exit," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Beojone, Caio Vitor & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2023. "A dynamic multi-region MFD model for ride-sourcing with ridesplitting," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    7. Gu, Ziyuan & Li, Yifan & Saberi, Meead & Rashidi, Taha H. & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2023. "Macroscopic parking dynamics and equitable pricing: Integrating trip-based modeling with simulation-based robust optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 354-381.
    8. Zheng, Nan & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2020. "Area-based equitable pricing strategies for multimodal urban networks with heterogeneous users," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 357-374.
    9. Yildirimoglu, Mehmet & Ramezani, Mohsen, 2020. "Demand management with limited cooperation among travellers: A doubly dynamic approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 267-284.
    10. Jia, Shuwei & Liu, Xiaolu & Yan, Guangle, 2019. "Effect of APCF policy on the haze pollution in China: A system dynamics approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 33-44.
    11. Shao, Jing & Yang, Hangjun & Xing, Xiaoqiang & Yang, Liu, 2016. "E-commerce and traffic congestion: An economic and policy analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 91-103.
    12. Lehe, Lewis J., 2017. "Downtown tolls and the distribution of trip lengths," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 11, pages 23-32.
    13. Ghafelebashi, Ali & Razaviyayn, Meisam & Dessouky, Maged, 2021. "Congestion Reduction via Personalized Incentives," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5b82168n, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Huo, Jinbiao & Liu, Zhiyuan & Chen, Jingxu & Cheng, Qixiu & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "Bayesian optimization for congestion pricing problems: A general framework and its instability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1-28.
    15. Johari, Mansour & Keyvan-Ekbatani, Mehdi, 2024. "Macroscopic modeling of mixed bi-modal urban networks: A hybrid model of accumulation- and trip-based principles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Pandey, Ayush & Lehe, Lewis J. & Gayah, Vikash V., 2024. "Local stability of traffic equilibria in an isotropic network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    17. Linfeng Li & Miyuan Shan, 2016. "Bidirectional Incentive Model for Bicycle Redistribution of a Bicycle Sharing System during Rush Hour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Anderson, Paul & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2020. "Dynamic lane restrictions on congested arterials," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 224-243.
    19. Lehe, Lewis J. & Pandey, Ayush, 2024. "A bathtub model of transit congestion," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    20. Li, Ye & Mohajerpoor, Reza & Ramezani, Mohsen, 2021. "Perimeter control with real-time location-varying cordon," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 101-120.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:8:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-017-0668-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.