IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v15y2024i6d10.1007_s13198-023-02228-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative analysis of preprocessing techniques on ultrasound images of CCA

Author

Listed:
  • Prathiba Jonnala

    (Vignan’s Foundation for Science Technology and Research University)

  • Sitaramanjaneya Reddy Guntur

    (Vignan’s Foundation for Science Technology and Research University)

Abstract

Stroke stands as a leading contributor to global mortality, with a substantial rise in human deaths attributable to cardiovascular diseases. Ultrasound imaging serves as a valuable tool for atherosclerotic plaque diagnosis, as plaque accumulation plays a pivotal role in the development of cardiovascular diseases, which can ultimately lead to fatal outcomes. Within this framework, a systematic and rational approach is essential for the identification and diagnosis of carotid plaque. This logical process will help to analyze and identify unrevealed data hidden in the ultrasound images of the common carotid artery. Several methods are applied to detect the presence of plaque within the common carotid artery. The primary goal of this paper is to give a widespread review of the filtering techniques and methods to reduce or eliminate the speckle noise to a certain extent in the ultrasound images of the common carotid artery. Although ultrasound imaging is one of the non-invasive and economical techniques, the obtained ultrasound images have low quality in terms of contrast, resolution, and sensitivity. To recover high quality images from the noise images, preprocessing are performed for de-noising the images in addition to image enhancement and restoration, which helps improve the ultrasound image quality. The comparative analysis of various preprocessing methods involves the assessment of performance indicators such as Peak Signal to Noise Ratio, Signal to Noise Ratio, Speckle Suppression Index, and Mean Square Error. Ultrasound B-mode carotid artery images underwent noise reduction using a range of techniques, including Average, Median, Gaussian, Anisotropic, Bilateral, Wiener, Lee, Wavelet, Total Variation, and Block matching 3D filtering methods. The goal was to diminish noise while retaining essential image features, a challenge addressed by various strategies within the existing literature. Each method carries its advantages and drawbacks. In this article, we detailed several significant studies in the realm of image de-noising. Initially, we introduced the problem of image de-noising and then proceeded to outline various de-noising techniques. Our discussion included the distinctive attributes of these techniques. To assess the effectiveness of different preprocessing strategies, we utilized performance metrics such as Mean Square Error (MSE), Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), and Speckle Suppression Index (SSI). Ultimately, we conducted a comparative analysis of the performance of traditional de-noising filters and presented the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Prathiba Jonnala & Sitaramanjaneya Reddy Guntur, 2024. "A comparative analysis of preprocessing techniques on ultrasound images of CCA," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(6), pages 2155-2162, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s13198-023-02228-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-023-02228-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-023-02228-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-023-02228-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s13198-023-02228-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.