IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v15y2024i5d10.1007_s13198-023-02199-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing classifiers by considering sentiment analysis of reported bugs for priority prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Anisha Singh

    (Jawaharlal Nehru University)

  • P. K. Kapur

    (Amity University)

  • V. B. Singh

    (Jawaharlal Nehru University)

Abstract

Software systems behave abnormally due to bugs when it comes into the operational phase. Lack of proper understanding of customer requirements, implementation, knowledge, wrong algorithmic designing, and other issue is also the reason for bug production. To fix those flaws, developers request to the users for feedback. Users have had issues with the software systems that have been released. Users are encouraged to submit their issues to issue-tracking systems such as Bugzilla, Mantis, Google Code Issue Tracker, GitHub Issue Tracker, and Jira to improve the next version of the product and meet user needs. Manual prioritization is time-consuming and inconvenient. In this research paper, we propose using sentiment analysis to anticipate the report's priority. This is the first time the sentiment-based approach used for a bug report to prioritize prediction on open-source projects. First, we take the bug report summary and use natural language pre-processing techniques to clean the text and pre-process the bug report. Second, sentiment analysis is applied to clean texts that contain sentiments of terms. Third, we use TF-IDF to construct a feature vector for bug reports, fourth, we used resampling techniques to balance the dataset, and then we used different machine learning classifiers to train historical data namely Bugzilla open-source projects to forecast their priority. The proposed method we have used improves the performance of the classifier with sentiment comparison to without sentiment on average f-score 2–10%.

Suggested Citation

  • Anisha Singh & P. K. Kapur & V. B. Singh, 2024. "Developing classifiers by considering sentiment analysis of reported bugs for priority prediction," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(5), pages 1888-1899, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-023-02199-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-023-02199-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-023-02199-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-023-02199-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-023-02199-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.