Author
Abstract
In software engineering, cross-project defect prediction is an important area in the field of defect prediction and change prediction. Software defect prediction aims for the identification of defects in the early stages of the software development life cycle. Defect prediction helps in optimizing the resources in terms of testing and reduction of maintenance efforts. Defect prediction works appropriately if a huge amount of data is available for training a prediction model. Nowadays, a sufficient amount of data is not available due to which we have to use different data for training and testing of a project. The cross-project defect prediction idea emerged when different projects are used as training and testing dataset for the identification of defects. To design a defect prediction model we have to consider only significant features out of all the features set. Feature selection techniques are categorized based on unsupervised and supervised learning. The major limitation of cross-project defect prediction is handling different data distributions of source and target projects. The experiment was conducted using AEEEM and ReLink software defect dataset. Moreover, five projects of AEEEM and three projects of ReLink with a maximum count of files in the selected projects are 1862 and 399. In this study, we have analyzed the effect of feature selection techniques in cross-project defect prediction. The results were analyzed using AUC. The significance of filter, wrapper, and swarm search-based methods for feature selection techniques was analyzed separately. There is a trade-off between computational complexity and the performance of feature selection techniques. Swarm search-based methods performed better than filter and wrapper methods in terms of computational cost and overall performance of the prediction modes. The results were statistically validated using Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed rank test.
Suggested Citation
Ruchika Malhotra & Shweta Meena, 2024.
"Empirical validation of feature selection techniques for cross-project defect prediction,"
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(5), pages 1743-1755, May.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-023-02051-7
DOI: 10.1007/s13198-023-02051-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-023-02051-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.