IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v12y2021i6d10.1007_s13198-021-01416-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of the QFD method to the design of a cocoa pulping machine

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Andrés García-León

    (Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander Ocaña)

  • Wailer Jaimes-Gonzalez

    (Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander Ocaña)

  • Lili Dahiana Becerra

    (Universidad Nacional de Colombia)

  • Eder Flórez-Solano

    (Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander Ocaña)

  • Malka Cabellos-Martínez

    (Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander Ocaña)

  • Daniel Meneses-Torres

    (Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander Ocaña)

Abstract

Cocoa pulping currently is a process that is developed manually in several regions of Colombia, due to many farms do not have enough technology to develop the cutting and pulping of the cocoa pod, which generates delays, low performance, low quality of the cocoa derives products and economic losses. The Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method and Bibliometric analysis (BA) were applied to designing a machine for cocoa pulping for a farm in Cesar, Colombia. Firstly, a Bibliometric analysis was developed to visualize trends and hot keywords, countries, and clusters related to the Cocoa and Quality of this essential agricultural branch worldwide of scientific obtaining publication details from the Scopus database. Secondly, the QFD method was applied to translate the customer requirements into detailed requirements to perform a low-cost machine, eco-friendly, versatile, and easy to use. Finally, the design results validation was carried out through the finite analysis method using Ansys and Solidworks CAD software. The BA results show that cocoa processing is an important topic worldwide, with a fast-growing of 2.59% in the last 76 years, where around 5800 authors have been published articles related to cocoa and quality subject in different ways. From QFD results and simulations obtained on the structure of the machine of AISI 304 steel, this material supports the stresses and deformations generated in the regular use of the machine (4700 pods per hour), guarantying the satisfaction of the customers, and above all the cocoa quality and the economy of the farm producers of cocoa beans in Colombia. Finally, the results obtained demonstrate that the QFD method is a valuable tool to knowing the needs and requirements of the customers and translate thus to engineering specifications where the design group develops different proposals taking into account costs, safety, and performance of the machine through modern computational CAD software and design theories.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Andrés García-León & Wailer Jaimes-Gonzalez & Lili Dahiana Becerra & Eder Flórez-Solano & Malka Cabellos-Martínez & Daniel Meneses-Torres, 2021. "Application of the QFD method to the design of a cocoa pulping machine," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(6), pages 1199-1220, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:12:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01416-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-021-01416-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-021-01416-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-021-01416-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    2. Vadivel Sengazani Murugesan & A. H. Sequeira & Sunil Kumar Jauhar & Vimal Kumar, 2020. "Sustainable postal service design: integrating quality function deployment from the customers perspective," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(2), pages 494-505, April.
    3. Isidro F. Aguillo, 2012. "Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(2), pages 343-351, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. R. A. García-León & D. Páez-Gómez & G. Guerrero-Gómez, 2023. "Theoretical design of a brake discs tribological machine," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(4), pages 1530-1542, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wilder Quintero-Quintero & Ana Beatriz Blanco-Ariza & Manuel Alfonso Garzón-Castrillón, 2021. "Intellectual Capital: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Deming Lin & Tianhui Gong & Wenbin Liu & Martin Meyer, 2020. "An entropy-based measure for the evolution of h index research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2283-2298, December.
    3. Merve Anaç & Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp & Kamil Erdayandi, 2023. "Prefabricated Construction Risks: A Holistic Exploration through Advanced Bibliometric Tool and Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-31, August.
    4. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Huyen Thanh T. Nguyen & Thanh-Hang Pham & Manh-Toan Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2021. "Assessing the ideological homogeneity in entrepreneurial finance research by highly cited publications," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Maksym Obrizan, 2018. "Economists in Ukraine: who are they and where do they publish?," Working Papers 3181, Research Consulting and Development.
    7. Hongxia Jin & Lu Lu & Haojun Fan, 2022. "Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Long COVID: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Zoltán Lakner & Brigitta Plasek & Gyula Kasza & Anna Kiss & Sándor Soós & Ágoston Temesi, 2021. "Towards Understanding the Food Consumer Behavior–Food Safety–Sustainability Triangle: A Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    9. Ying Liang & Wei Song, 2022. "Ecological and Environmental Effects of Land Use and Cover Changes on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: A Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Lanzalonga Federico & Chmet Federico & Petrolo Basilio & Brescia Valerio, 2023. "Exploring Diversity Management to Avoid Social Washing and Pinkwashing: Using Bibliometric Analysis to Shape Future Research Directions," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 41-65, March.
    11. Jussi T. S. Heikkila, 2020. "Classifying economics for the common good: Connecting sustainable development goals to JEL codes," Papers 2004.04384, arXiv.org.
    12. Wirapong Chansanam & Chunqiu Li, 2022. "Scientometrics of Poverty Research for Sustainability Development: Trend Analysis of the 1964–2022 Data through Scopus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Zhichao Wang & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2021. "Performance Analysis of Hospitals in Australia and its Peers: A Systematic Review," CEPA Working Papers Series WP012021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    14. Norma Salgado-Orellana & Emilio Berrocal de-Luna & Calixto Gutiérrez-Braojos, 2021. "A scientometric study of doctoral theses on the Roma in the Iberian Peninsula during the 1977–2018 period," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 437-458, January.
    15. Simon Hartmann & Thomas Lindner & Jakob Müllner & Jonas Puck, 2022. "Beyond the nation-state: Anchoring supranational institutions in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1282-1306, August.
    16. Nicolás Ruiz, Néstor & Suárez Alonso, María Luisa & Vidal-Abarca, María Rosario, 2021. "Contributions of dry rivers to human well-being: A global review for future research," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    17. Hiranya Dissanayake & D.B.P.H. Dissabandara & K.L.W. Perera & A.R. Ajward, 2023. "Bibliometric analysis on the Covid-19 impact on corporate sustainability," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 14(8), pages 57-71, June.
    18. Francisco García-Lillo & Eduardo Sánchez-García & Bartolomé Marco-Lajara & Pedro Seva-Larrosa, 2023. "Renewable Energies and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Ejovi Akpojevwe Abafe & Yonas T. Bahta & Henry Jordaan, 2022. "Exploring Biblioshiny for Historical Assessment of Global Research on Sustainable Use of Water in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-34, August.
    20. Carmela Iorio & Giuseppe Pandolfo & Antonio D’Ambrosio & Roberta Siciliano, 2020. "Mining big data in tourism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(5), pages 1655-1669, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:12:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s13198-021-01416-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.