IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v11y2020i4d10.1007_s13198-019-00837-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis and reflection on peer assessment results based on short play of game theory

Author

Listed:
  • Lifang Qiao

    (Shijiazhuang Tiedao University)

  • Zhengyou Wang

    (Shijiazhuang Tiedao University)

  • Sanqing Bao

    (Shijiazhuang Tiedao University)

  • Yanhui Xia

    (Shijiazhuang Tiedao University)

Abstract

Peer assessment is an important part to evaluate college students’ learning effect and ability in blended learning. Peer assessment guided by teachers encourages students to engage in classroom and leads to the learner-centered classroom. Peer assessment studies in higher education mainly focus on the students’ attitude to peer assessment and the effectiveness of peer assessment. However, little exploration has been made on how to deal with and prevent the bad results of peer assessment, which has an important impact on improving the quality of peer assessment. By Game Principles Course, this research puts forward the idea of building a peer assessment loop to improve the quality of peer assessment and prevent the bad results of peer assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Lifang Qiao & Zhengyou Wang & Sanqing Bao & Yanhui Xia, 2020. "Analysis and reflection on peer assessment results based on short play of game theory," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(4), pages 780-784, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:11:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s13198-019-00837-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-019-00837-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-019-00837-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-019-00837-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:11:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s13198-019-00837-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.