IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/vyid10.1007_s00038-020-01386-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic mixed studies reviews: leveraging the literature to answer complex questions through the integration of quantitative and qualitative evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Cerigo

    (McGill University)

  • Amélie Quesnel-Vallée

    (McGill University
    McGill University)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Cerigo & Amélie Quesnel-Vallée, 0. "Systematic mixed studies reviews: leveraging the literature to answer complex questions through the integration of quantitative and qualitative evidence," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 0, pages 1-5.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v::y::i::d:10.1007_s00038-020-01386-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00038-020-01386-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00038-020-01386-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00038-020-01386-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Heyvaert & B. Maes & P. Onghena, 2013. "Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 659-676, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gjoko Stamenkov, 2023. "Recommendations for improving research quality: relationships among constructs, verbs in hypotheses, theoretical perspectives, and triangulation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2923-2946, June.
    2. Tim Noblet & John Marriott & Amanda Hensman-Crook & Simon O’Shea & Sarah Friel & Alison Rushton, 2020. "Independent prescribing by advanced physiotherapists for patients with low back pain in primary care: A feasibility trial with an embedded qualitative component," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-33, March.
    3. Liz Forbat & Natalie Kunicki & Michael Chapman & Clare Lovell, 2017. "How and why are subcutaneous fluids administered in an advanced illness population: a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1204-1216, May.
    4. Spasojevic, Bojana & Lohmann, Gui & Scott, Noel, 2019. "Leadership and governance in air route development," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Helen Cerigo & Amélie Quesnel-Vallée, 2020. "Systematic mixed studies reviews: leveraging the literature to answer complex questions through the integration of quantitative and qualitative evidence," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(5), pages 699-703, June.
    6. Mattia Casula & Nandhini Rangarajan & Patricia Shields, 2021. "The potential of working hypotheses for deductive exploratory research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1703-1725, October.
    7. Lawarée, Justin & Jacob, Steve & Ouimet, Mathieu, 2020. "A scoping review of knowledge syntheses in the field of evaluation across four decades of practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Mohammad Amini Farsani & Esmat Babaii & Maryam Beikmohammadi & Meysam Babaii Farsani, 2022. "Mixed-methods research proficiency for applied linguists: a PLS-path modelling approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3337-3362, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v::y::i::d:10.1007_s00038-020-01386-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.