IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v51y2006i5p259-272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process Evaluation of a Dutch Community Intervention to improve Health Related Behaviour in deprived neighbourhoods

Author

Listed:
  • Gittte Kloek
  • Frank Lenthe
  • Yvonne Meertens
  • Maria Koelen
  • Johan Mackenbach

Abstract

L’évaluation de processus indique qu’il est possible de mettre en œuvre une intervention dans une communauté défavorisée selon les critères d’une «approche communautaire». Cependant, il est probable que l’ensemble des interventions n’a pas eu un impact suffisant et n’a pas permis une exposition propre à induire des changements de comportements dans la communauté entière. Copyright Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Gittte Kloek & Frank Lenthe & Yvonne Meertens & Maria Koelen & Johan Mackenbach, 2006. "Process Evaluation of a Dutch Community Intervention to improve Health Related Behaviour in deprived neighbourhoods," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 51(5), pages 259-272, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:51:y:2006:i:5:p:259-272
    DOI: 10.1007/s00038-006-5063-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00038-006-5063-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00038-006-5063-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schwartz, S. & Carpenter, K.M., 1999. "The right answer for the wrong question: Consequences of type III error for public health research," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(8), pages 1175-1180.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gunjan Saxena & Avani Mohan Singh, 2014. "Amorphous Family Nexus: An Analytical Tool in Considering Community/m-MGO Haritika's Ties in Bundelkhand, Central India," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(10), pages 2419-2434, October.
    2. Ming Wen & Christopher R. Browning & Kathleen A. Cagney, 2007. "Neighbourhood Deprivation, Social Capital and Regular Exercise during Adulthood: A Multilevel Study in Chicago," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(13), pages 2651-2671, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McAneney, H. & McCann, J.F. & Prior, L. & Wilde, J. & Kee, F., 2010. "Translating evidence into practice: A shared priority in public health?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1492-1500, May.
    2. Bauer, Greta R., 2014. "Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: Challenges and the potential to advance health equity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 10-17.
    3. Schwartz, Sharon & Meyer, Ilan H., 2010. "Mental health disparities research: The impact of within and between group analyses on tests of social stress hypotheses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1111-1118, April.
    4. Bridget O'Laughlin & Moritz Hunsmann, 2016. "Forum 2016," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 47(4), pages 798-817, July.
    5. Valérie Lederer & Karen Messing & Hélène Sultan-Taïeb, 2022. "How Can Quantitative Analysis Be Used to Improve Occupational Health without Reinforcing Social Inequalities? An Examination of Statistical Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:51:y:2006:i:5:p:259-272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.