IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v43y1998i4p195-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frakturen im höheren Lebensalter: Wie sensitiv sind postalische Fragebögen?

Author

Listed:
  • Angelica Raspe
  • Regine Klockgether
  • Ute Domarus
  • Christine Matthis

Abstract

Nous avons interrogé, dans le cadre de l'enquête européenne prospective sur l'ostéoporose, 144 hommes et femmes traités à la suite d'une fracture dans un hôpital communal dans les 12 mois précédents, afin d'évaluer les questionnaires envoyés par courrier et portant sur les fractures chez les personnes âgées (50 ans et plus). Les taux de faux négatifs dans les réponses à la question portant sur une fracture survenue dans cette période s'élevait à 8% des personnes interrogées, pourcentage plus bas que dans d'autres enquêtes analogues. Le type et la fréquence des interviews jouent un rôle important. Par contre l'adjonction d'une représentation schématique du corps humain ne permettait que dans deux tiers des cas de situer la fracture. Une représentation unidimensionelle, de taille réduite et l'absence de représentation du squelette sont à l'origine dans un tiers des cas des localisations incorrectes des fractures. Copyright Birkhäuser Verlag 1998

Suggested Citation

  • Angelica Raspe & Regine Klockgether & Ute Domarus & Christine Matthis, 1998. "Frakturen im höheren Lebensalter: Wie sensitiv sind postalische Fragebögen?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 43(4), pages 195-200, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:43:y:1998:i:4:p:195-200
    DOI: 10.1007/BF01349249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF01349249
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF01349249?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:43:y:1998:i:4:p:195-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.