IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v43y1998i4p177-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ist der subjektive Gesundheitstatus ein guter Prädiktor für die Wiederaufnahme der Arbeit?

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Weber
  • Monika Wilhelm
  • Ulrike Weber
  • Heiner Raspe

Abstract

L'étude examine comment les personnes en incapacité de travail de longue durée à la suite d'une dorsopathie estiment leur état de santé et quelle influence exercent ces estimations subjectives sur la reprise de travail. La question du caractère prédictif de l'état de santé perçu est analysée à l'aide des donnée recueillies chez 663 persones. Les données portant sur l'état de santé perçu au 42ème jour d' arrêt de travail sont mises en rapport avec la variable cible (outcome) «inapte au travail»/ «apte au travail» au bout de 84 jours. On constate au moyen d'analyses unifactorielles et plurifactorielles que les deux groupes («encore inapte au travail après 84 jours» et «reprise du travail») présentaient déjà au 42ème jour de la mise en ârret-maladie des differences portant sur leur prognostic subjectif concernant la reprise du travail et leur état de santé. Les calculs effectués montrent que l'état de santé perçu en relation avec le prognostic subjectif de reprise de travail permet certes de prédire correctement la non-reprise du travail mais ne permet pas de prédire suffisamment bien la reprise du travail. Copyright Birkhäuser Verlag 1998

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Weber & Monika Wilhelm & Ulrike Weber & Heiner Raspe, 1998. "Ist der subjektive Gesundheitstatus ein guter Prädiktor für die Wiederaufnahme der Arbeit?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 43(4), pages 177-184, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:43:y:1998:i:4:p:177-184
    DOI: 10.1007/BF01349247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF01349247
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF01349247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:43:y:1998:i:4:p:177-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.