IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijlaec/v59y2016i1d10.1007_s41027-016-0051-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transforming peasantries in India and China: comparative investigations of institutional dimensions

Author

Listed:
  • Ashwani Saith

    (International Institute of Social Studies)

Abstract

My lecture is about the study of transforming peasantries, in two senses: both as the subjects, as well as the agents of societal transformation. The differential development performance of rural India and China is explained through stylised micro-comparisons drawn from longitudinal village, and synthetic field studies conducted by the author in both countries since the 1970s, highlighting the salience of contrasting rural institutional factors, using a string of binary contrasting features displayed by the Indian village vis-a-vis the collectives of rural China. The micro-cosmic comparison poses a puzzling paradox: Chinese rural development performance easily outstripped Indian achievements in the first three decades of its collectivist path, from 1949–1978, despite the upheavals associated with the Great Leap Forward and the large-scale famines of the time. But, if the initial conditions of the two countries were remarkably equivalent, and if the external factors, state macro and inter-sectoral policies were no more, and in some respects, considerably less favourable in China than in India, how can one explain the superior Chinese performance in the countryside virtually across the board for this early high-collectvism period that laid the foundations for the subsequent high-growth trajectory at the national level? Why did rural China pull ahead, why did India lag behind? The micro-cosmic comparisons of rural institutions are used to resolve this paradox. The answer lies in the crucial differentiated role of the institutional dimension in the two countries. Chinese advantage originates not in the market reforms era, but in the socialist period when the countryside was organised in rural collectives. In India, rural institutions were generally obstructive, sticky, and posed a constraint to policies of rapid transformation; in China, the institutional profile, far from setting a constraint, was itself converted into a policy instrumental variable, where institutional features were designed and periodically redesigned primarily using the criteria of their functional appropriateness for generating rural accumulation and growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashwani Saith, 2016. "Transforming peasantries in India and China: comparative investigations of institutional dimensions," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 59(1), pages 85-124, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijlaec:v:59:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s41027-016-0051-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s41027-016-0051-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41027-016-0051-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41027-016-0051-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thorner, Daniel & Thorner, Alice, 1962. "Book Review- Land and Labour in India," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 17(4), pages 1-6.
    2. Saith, A. & Tankha, A., 1992. "Longitudinal analysis of structural change in a north Indian village, 1970-1987 : some preliminary findings," ISS Working Papers - General Series 18869, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    3. Keith Griffin, 1984. "Institutional Reform and Economic Development in the Chinese Countryside," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-16662-6, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rolph van der Hoeven, 2018. "Employment and development in Asia," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-107, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Rolph van der Hoeven, 2018. "Employment and development in Asia," WIDER Working Paper Series 107, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. K. P. Kannan, 2022. "India’s Elusive Quest for Inclusive Development: An Employment Perspective," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 65(3), pages 579-623, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitrios Zikos & Ulrich Wurzel, 2023. "Bringing Economic and Political Power Back In: A Call for Re-Politicising Development Research," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Christophe Jaffrelot, 2017. "The Roots and Varieties of Political Conservatism in India," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 5(2), pages 205-217, December.
    3. Arsel, M. & Dasgupta, A., 2010. "Structural change, land use and the state in China," ISS Working Papers - General Series 21528, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    4. Tirthankar Roy, 2021. "Why geography matters to the economic history of India," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 273-289, November.
    5. Yanrui Wu, 1993. "Productive Efficiency in Chinese Industry," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 7(2), pages 58-66, November.
    6. Alice Goldstein & Sidney Goldstein & Shenyang Guo, 1991. "Temporary Migrants in Shanghai Households, 1984," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 28(2), pages 275-291, May.
    7. Srivastava, Ravi S., 2005. "Bonded labour in India : its incidence and pattern," ILO Working Papers 993779363402676, International Labour Organization.
    8. Sarmistha Pal, 2000. "Economic reform and household welfare in rural China: evidence from household survey data," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(2), pages 187-206.
    9. Rizwanul Islam, 1991. "Growth of Rural Industries in Post‐reform China: Patterns, Determinants and Consequences," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 22(4), pages 687-724, October.
    10. Sándor Péter, 1987. "Reform and Paternalism in China: Some Theoretical Concerns," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 11(1), pages 59-73, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijlaec:v:59:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s41027-016-0051-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.