Author
Listed:
- Huseyin Caliskan
(Çankırı Karatekin University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences)
- Ustuner Birben
(Çankırı Karatekin University)
- Sezgin Ozden
(Çankırı Karatekin University)
Abstract
This study investigates the evolving dynamics of forest management in Türkiye, focusing on the intersection of economic pressures, legal changes, and ecological consequences. In recent decades, Türkiye has experienced a paradigm shift toward multifunctional forest management, driven by global sustainability goals and the influence of international agreements. Despite these advancements and constitutional safeguards, rising wood production, driven by private sector demand, has led to concerns over the sustainability of forest ecosystems. Employing Cashore and Stone’s tripartite framework as a methodological outline under an institutional approach within a process tracing perspective, this research analyzes Türkiye’s regulatory evolution, economic dependencies, and the implications of sovereign authority on forest governance. Data sources include forest inventory reports, development plans, and economic and legal documents, analyzed to identify causal pathways and assess Türkiye’s alignment with international practices. The findings highlight inconsistencies between policy objectives and implementation, particularly regarding industrial plantations, which are critical for reducing pressure on forests. The study underscores the need for policies that balance economic exploitation and ecological protection. Strengthening industrial plantation efforts and aligning them with global best practices are recommended to ensure long-term sustainability. By integrating multifunctionality into policy frameworks and addressing emerging ecological risks, Türkiye can better manage its forests to support both economic development and biodiversity conservation.
Suggested Citation
Huseyin Caliskan & Ustuner Birben & Sezgin Ozden, 2025.
"Forest management in Türkiye: economic pressures, legal frameworks, and ecological consequences,"
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 21-39, March.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:25:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10784-024-09657-7
DOI: 10.1007/s10784-024-09657-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:25:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10784-024-09657-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.