IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v15y2025i1d10.1186_s13561-025-00612-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring productivity in the healthcare sector: a bibliometric and content analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ionela-Andreea Puiu

    (University of Bucharest)

  • Abigaela Bîlbîie

    (The Academy of Economic Studies)

Abstract

Background Productivity in the healthcare sector has evolved as an appealing research topic in the last few years. Despite the growing interest, the extant scientific literature mostly concentrates on methodologies rather than theoretical and practical insights. Although diverse methodologies provide valuable quantitative wisdom, their application is often misaligned with broader economic theories or healthcare purposes, limiting their contribution to advancing theoretical and practical understanding of efficiency and productivity in healthcare systems. In this respect, the current study endeavors to bridge the research gap concerning the lack of a comprehensive overview of productivity measurements in the healthcare sector. Methods We investigate this concern through a bibliometric and content analysis of articles published on healthcare productivity measurement techniques in the Web of Science database between 2003 and 2023. We provide a quantitative and critical analysis of conceptualization, methods, findings, and implications of the selected published articles concerning productivity measurements in the healthcare sector. Results Our research discovered that the sanitary crisis generated by COVID-19 boosted the publication of scientific papers on productivity measurements in healthcare, with Europe emerging as a leading region in publication output. Although Data Envelopment Analysis and the Malmquist Index monopolize the range of measurement techniques used to quantify productivity, current research highlights the requirement for alternative methodologies to grasp the multidimensionality of healthcare productivity, including its interaction with quality and technological progress. Conclusions We raise awareness that future efforts should prioritize multidimensional and context-sensitive approaches to measuring healthcare productivity, balancing efficiency, technological progress, and quality of care. Policymakers should focus on designing context-specific policies tailored to regional challenges and promoting targeted research funding to explore underrepresented areas of healthcare services.

Suggested Citation

  • Ionela-Andreea Puiu & Abigaela Bîlbîie, 2025. "Measuring productivity in the healthcare sector: a bibliometric and content analysis," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-025-00612-z
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-025-00612-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-025-00612-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-025-00612-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-025-00612-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.