IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/hecrev/v15y2025i1d10.1186_s13561-025-00603-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What can we learn about the impact of cancelled planned operations on waiting times? A case study using the 2017/18 winter flu postponement policy in England

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Ana Matias

    (University of York)

  • Rita Santos

    (University of York)

  • Nils Gutacker

    (University of York)

  • Anne Mason

    (University of York)

  • Nigel Rice

    (University of York
    University of York)

Abstract

Background Cancelled operations can potentially impact both health and patient experience through their effect on waiting times. However, identifying causal relationships is challenging. One possible solution is to consider ‘exogenous shocks’ to the system as a type of natural experiment to quantify impacts. In this study, we investigate the 2017/18 national cancellation policy in the English National Health Service (NHS), introduced to alleviate winter pressures due to influenza related admissions. Our aim is to see whether this policy can be used to isolate the impact of changes in the supply of care on waiting times and so inform system recovery from major exogenous shocks, such as the coronavirus pandemic. Methods To assess the impact of cancellations on hospital activity and waiting times, we use aggregate quarterly hospital-level data on planned admissions and last-minute planned operations (2013/14 to 2019/20); and individual-level data on waiting times for planned care (2015/16 to 2018/19). We analyse trends in volume of activity and waiting times, and examine waiting times distributions for patients who were admitted for planned surgery from the waiting list before and after the 2017/18 cancellation policy. Results The final quarter of 2017/18 had the highest number of cancelled planned operations since 2013/14 and the lowest number of planned admissions since 2015/16. However, the trend in mean and median waiting times was similar across the study period. Therefore, the 2017/18 national postponement policy had no identifiable impact on waiting times trends. Conclusions Despite the high numbers of cancelled planned operations in 2017/18, we could not identify an impact on waiting times. A plausible explanation is that hospital managers routinely anticipate winter pressures and reduce planned activity to manage bed occupancy. Therefore, the 2017/18 national postponement policy merely reinforced existing local decisions. The lack of a suitable counterfactual from which to infer what would have happened in 2017/18 in the absence of a postponement policy makes it impossible to isolate the impact on waiting times. This means that previous NHS cancellation policies are of limited use for informing system recovery from major exogenous shocks, such as the coronavirus pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Ana Matias & Rita Santos & Nils Gutacker & Anne Mason & Nigel Rice, 2025. "What can we learn about the impact of cancelled planned operations on waiting times? A case study using the 2017/18 winter flu postponement policy in England," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-025-00603-0
    DOI: 10.1186/s13561-025-00603-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13561-025-00603-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13561-025-00603-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:hecrev:v:15:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s13561-025-00603-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13561 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.