IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v6y1997i5d10.1023_a1008650903043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Multilateral Environmental Negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Pamela Chasek

    (Earth Negotiations Bulletin)

Abstract

Global environmental problems pose important diplomatic and legal challenges to the international community. The nature of these problems requires an unprecedented degree of international cooperation that is achieved through multilateral negotiation, which is often shaped by scientific uncertainty, the complexity of the issues, and the wide range of actors and interests. One way of analyzing and explaining this complicated process is through the use of comparative analysis. By breaking down the negotiating process into a series of phases and turning points, it becomes easier to analyze the roles of different actors, the management of issues, the formation of groups and coalitions, and the art of consensus building. This article uses comparative analysis to characterize, develop, and specify a model of the multilateral environmental negotiation process. The model is elaborated upon inductively through a comparative analysis of eleven cases of multilateral environmental negotiations. Statistical techniques are used to determine whether there is any relationship among attributes of the process (within the phases or at the turning points) and between these characteristics and outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamela Chasek, 1997. "A Comparative Analysis of Multilateral Environmental Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 6(5), pages 437-461, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:6:y:1997:i:5:d:10.1023_a:1008650903043
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1008650903043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1008650903043
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1008650903043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lincoln P. Bloomfield & Robert Beattie, 1971. "Computers and policy-making: the CASCON experiment," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 15(1), pages 33-46, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gilles Rotillon & Tazdaït Tarik, 2003. "Coopération internationale et problèmes environnementaux globaux : vision normative versus vision positive," Revue d’économie du développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 11(1), pages 101-134.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Druckman & Jennifer Martin & Susan Allen Nan & Dimostenis Yagcioglu, 1999. "Dimensions of International Negotiation: A Test of Iklé's Typology," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 89-108, March.
    2. Daniel Druckman, 1997. "Dimensions of International Negotiations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 6(5), pages 395-420, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:6:y:1997:i:5:d:10.1023_a:1008650903043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.