IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v24y2015i5d10.1007_s10726-014-9418-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Group Decision-Making Aggregation Model for Contractor Selection in Large Scale Construction Projects Based on Two-Stage Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Bingsheng Liu

    (Tianjin University)

  • Tengfei Huo

    (Business School of Hohai University)

  • Pinchao Liao

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Jie Gong

    (The State University of New Jersey)

  • Bin Xue

    (Tianjin University)

Abstract

Modern projects are normally characterized by huge investments, long construction periods, and complex technology. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate contractor for smooth project delivery is challenging. Previous studies attempted to develop suitable frameworks for contractor selection. However, correlation among indicators, the subjectivity of indicator weights, and heterogeneity among experts’ professional capabilities for selecting contractors were not successfully removed from the decision-making process. Typical partial least square (PLS) path modeling can solve these problems. However, it can only solve problems with the same direction correlation among the indicators (e.g., the correlation coefficients of the indicators are all positive). For indicators with different direction correlations, path modeling is helpless. Aiming to overcome this limitation, this research introduces a group decision model based on two-stage PLSs path modeling. This decision model can eliminate correlation among indicators and the impact of subjectivity and heterogeneity among experts on the reliability of weighting schemes; more importantly, it can effectively solve the problem of having correlation indicators with different directions. Through a literature review, we first established an indicator system of contractor selection on large scale construction projects. Second, a two-stage PLS path modeling combined with the maximization of deviations principle was proposed as an aggregation approach for performance evaluation. Finally, a comparison was made between the two-stage and typical PLS path modeling methods through a case study, which was conducted to validate the reliability of the new approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Bingsheng Liu & Tengfei Huo & Pinchao Liao & Jie Gong & Bin Xue, 2015. "A Group Decision-Making Aggregation Model for Contractor Selection in Large Scale Construction Projects Based on Two-Stage Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path Modeling," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 855-883, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:24:y:2015:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-014-9418-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-014-9418-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-014-9418-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-014-9418-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Jennings & Gary Holt, 1998. "Prequalification and multi-criteria selection: a measure of contractors' opinions," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 651-660.
    2. Weber, Charles A. & Current, John R. & Benton, W. C., 1991. "Vendor selection criteria and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 2-18, January.
    3. Sidhartha Siladitya Padhi & Pratap Kumar Jagadev Mohapatra, 2009. "Contractor selection in government procurement auctions: a case study," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 170-186.
    4. Zedan Hatush & Martin Skitmore, 1997. "Criteria for contractor selection," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 19-38.
    5. Michel Tenenhaus, 2011. "Regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis," Post-Print hal-00578321, HAL.
    6. Jakobowicz, Emmanuel & Derquenne, Christian, 2007. "A modified PLS path modeling algorithm handling reflective categorical variables and a new model building strategy," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 3666-3678, May.
    7. Wang, Xiaoting & Triantaphyllou, Evangelos, 2008. "Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 45-63, February.
    8. Arthur Tenenhaus & Michel Tenenhaus, 2011. "Regularized Generalized Canonical Correlation Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 257-284, April.
    9. Cabrerizo, Francisco Javier & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique & Pedrycz, Witold, 2013. "A method based on PSO and granular computing of linguistic information to solve group decision making problems defined in heterogeneous contexts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 624-633.
    10. Michel Tenenhaus & Arthur Tenenhaus, 2011. "Regularized Generalized Canonical Correlation Analysis," Post-Print hal-00609220, HAL.
    11. Eddie W. L. Cheng & Heng Li, 2004. "Contractor selection using the analytic network process," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(10), pages 1021-1032, December.
    12. Tenenhaus, Michel & Vinzi, Vincenzo Esposito & Chatelin, Yves-Marie & Lauro, Carlo, 2005. "PLS path modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 159-205, January.
    13. Chee Wong & Gary Holt & Patricia Cooper, 2000. "Lowest price or value? Investigation of UK construction clients' tender selection process," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 767-774.
    14. Mohd Nishat Faisal & D.K. Banwet & Ravi Shankar, 2007. "Quantification of risk mitigation environment of supply chains using graph theory and matrix methods," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 22-39.
    15. Zedan Hatush & Martin Skitmore, 1997. "Assessment and evaluation of contractor data against client goals using PERT approach," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 327-340.
    16. Chiclana, F. & Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. & Alonso, S., 2007. "Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 383-399, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shrey Jain & Sunil Kumar Jauhar & Piyush, 2024. "A machine-learning-based framework for contractor selection and order allocation in public construction projects considering sustainability, risk, and safety," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 225-267, July.
    2. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chen, Yue, 2021. "Circular supply chain management with large scale group decision making in the big data era: The macro-micro model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Khoso, Ali Raza & Yusof, Aminah Md & Chen, Zhen-Song & Skibniewski, Mirosław J. & Chin, Kwai-Sang & Khahro, Shabir Hussain & Sohu, Samiullah, 2022. "Comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art contractor selection models in construction environment-A critical review and future call," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    5. Zydrune Morkunaite & Romualdas Bausys & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2019. "Contractor Selection for Sgraffito Decoration of Cultural Heritage Buildings Using the WASPAS-SVNS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarstedt, Marko & Hair, Joseph F. & Ringle, Christian M. & Thiele, Kai O. & Gudergan, Siegfried P., 2016. "Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies!," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 3998-4010.
    2. Tenenhaus, Arthur & Philippe, Cathy & Frouin, Vincent, 2015. "Kernel Generalized Canonical Correlation Analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 114-131.
    3. Michel Tenenhaus & Arthur Tenenhaus & Patrick J. F. Groenen, 2017. "Regularized Generalized Canonical Correlation Analysis: A Framework for Sequential Multiblock Component Methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 737-777, September.
    4. Joseph F. Hair & G. Tomas M. Hult & Christian M. Ringle & Marko Sarstedt & Kai Oliver Thiele, 2017. "Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 616-632, September.
    5. Rosaria Romano & Francesco Palumbo, 2021. "Partial possibilistic regression path modeling: handling uncertainty in path modeling," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 615-639, March.
    6. Cristina Davino & Vincenzo Esposito Vinzi, 2016. "Quantile composite-based path modeling," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(4), pages 491-520, December.
    7. Cristina Davino & Pasquale Dolce & Stefania Taralli & Domenico Vistocco, 2022. "Composite-Based Path Modeling for Conditional Quantiles Prediction. An Application to Assess Health Differences at Local Level in a Well-Being Perspective," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 907-936, June.
    8. Amirhosein Jafari, 2013. "A contractor pre-qualification model based on the quality function deployment method," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 746-760, July.
    9. Tenenhaus, Arthur & Tenenhaus, Michel, 2014. "Regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis for multiblock or multigroup data analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 391-403.
    10. Francesca Petrarca & Silvia Terzi, 2018. "The Global Competitiveness Index: an alternative measure with endogenously derived weights," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2197-2219, September.
    11. Husson, François & Josse, Julie & Saporta, Gilbert, 2016. "Jan de Leeuw and the French School of Data Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 73(i06).
    12. Xiuli Du & Xiaohu Jiang & Jinguan Lin, 2023. "Multinomial Logistic Factor Regression for Multi-source Functional Block-wise Missing Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 975-1001, September.
    13. Wang, Wenjia & Zhou, Yi-Hui, 2021. "Eigenvector-based sparse canonical correlation analysis: Fast computation for estimation of multiple canonical vectors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    14. Evermann, Joerg & Tate, Mary, 2016. "Assessing the predictive performance of structural equation model estimators," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4565-4582.
    15. Heungsun Hwang & Gyeongcheol Cho, 2020. "Global Least Squares Path Modeling: A Full-Information Alternative to Partial Least Squares Path Modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(4), pages 947-972, December.
    16. Florian Rohart & Benoît Gautier & Amrit Singh & Kim-Anh Lê Cao, 2017. "mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.
    17. Lukáš Malec & Vladimír Janovský, 2020. "Connecting the multivariate partial least squares with canonical analysis: a path-following approach," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(3), pages 589-609, September.
    18. Shen, Cencheng & Sun, Ming & Tang, Minh & Priebe, Carey E., 2014. "Generalized canonical correlation analysis for classification," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 310-322.
    19. Stéphanie Bougeard & Hervé Abdi & Gilbert Saporta & Ndèye Niang, 2018. "Clusterwise analysis for multiblock component methods," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(2), pages 285-313, June.
    20. Cheaitou, Ali & Larbi, Rim & Al Housani, Bashayer, 2019. "Decision making framework for tender evaluation and contractor selection in public organizations with risk considerations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:24:y:2015:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-014-9418-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.