IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/gjofsm/v18y2017i1d10.1007_s40171-016-0146-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Usability Evaluation of English, Local and Plain Languages to Enhance On-Screen Text Readability: A Use Case of Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Walayat Hussain

    (University of Technology Sydney)

  • Omar Khadeer Hussain

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Farookh Khadeer Hussain

    (University of Technology Sydney)

  • Muhammad Qasim Khan

    (Sungkyunkwan University)

Abstract

In today’s digital world, information can very easily be accessed and digitally processed anywhere. Devices which are capable of processing digital data range from desktop computers to laptops, mobile phones, tablets, and personal digital assistants. For effective communication, text on a Web site should catch a reader’s attention and should be easy to both read and understand. Different constraints are associated with on-screen text readability and legibility, such as font size, color, and style, as well as foreground and background color contrast, line spacing, text congestion, vocabulary and grammar, but text recognition and comprehension are two of the major problems. In this study, we address the issue of how to enhance text readability for non-native English speakers who have a basic understanding of English language and speak local languages which are not formally taught in academia. We select a use case in Pakistan, a country in which English and Urdu are the official languages, and a number of local languages are spoken in different parts of the country. Due to the wide variety of local languages, no Web site can support the many local language scripts or alphabets and display them on digital devices. When users with only a basic knowledge of English—particularly low-literate users from a local language background—try to read an English text, it is highly challenging for them to understand the meaning of words. In this study, we propose a plain language scheme in which a text is converted into a roman text. A roman text is formed by using the English alphabet and combining letters in such a way that when it is read, it sounds like a local language. To evaluate the applicability of our approach, we conducted a survey of users from different educational backgrounds, using a text written in English, local and plain language from users who speak particular local language. For each survey, we took three to four paragraphs in English on general interest topics and translated it into local language and plain language. To measure the acceptability of each approach, we used five usability engineering attributes as a benchmark—efficiency, effectiveness, learnability, memorability, and satisfaction. From the results of the analysis, we observe that our proposed plain language scheme is more efficient, effective, learnable and memorable, and achieves a higher satisfaction level for low-literate users than two other languages.

Suggested Citation

  • Walayat Hussain & Omar Khadeer Hussain & Farookh Khadeer Hussain & Muhammad Qasim Khan, 2017. "Usability Evaluation of English, Local and Plain Languages to Enhance On-Screen Text Readability: A Use Case of Pakistan," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 18(1), pages 33-49, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:18:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s40171-016-0146-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40171-016-0146-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40171-016-0146-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40171-016-0146-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pradeep Kumar Roy & Zishan Ahmad & Jyoti Prakash Singh & Mohammad Abdallah Ali Alryalat & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2018. "Finding and Ranking High-Quality Answers in Community Question Answering Sites," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(1), pages 53-68, March.
    2. Anushree Karani & Heena Thanki & Sarla Achuthan, 2021. "Impact of University Website Usability on Satisfaction: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 46(2), pages 119-138, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:18:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s40171-016-0146-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.