Author
Listed:
- Xinxin Luo
(Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)
- Zaiwu Gong
(Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)
- Weiwei Guo
(Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)
- Guo Wei
(University of North Carolina at Pembroke)
- Ting Jin
(Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)
Abstract
Preference disaggregation is a common method used in multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA) to derive preference models and reproduce the preference information of decision makers (DMs). Due to cognitive uncertainty, DMs may not be able to accurately, directly, and deterministically portray their preferences based on their own cognition, causing difficulties when trying to efficiently merging group information. To explore reasonable resolutions, this article addresses the uncertainty in the preference information provided by DMs and portrays this information by utilizing uncertainty theory. Furthermore, it integrates group information by constructing social networks and analyzing the similarity of decision results of DMs. Specifically, a group preference learning model is designed to aggregate the diverse individual preference information into group decision-making in accordance with trust-similarity centrality. Ultimately, by fully utilizing this integrated information, a group decision-making recommendation is produced. For missing values in the trust network, the product axiom is used as a propagation operator to maximize the propagated trust. To illustrate the proposed model, it is applied to rank European countries in terms of their university qualities. Finally, the proposed model is compared with the existing models that incorporate preference disaggregation or social networks, and the effectiveness of the proposed model in handling uncertainty and the advantages in interpretability are demonstrated.
Suggested Citation
Xinxin Luo & Zaiwu Gong & Weiwei Guo & Guo Wei & Ting Jin, 2025.
"On disaggregation modeling of uncertainty group preferences considering trust networks,"
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 29-68, March.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:24:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10700-025-09438-0
DOI: 10.1007/s10700-025-09438-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fuzodm:v:24:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10700-025-09438-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.