IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/finsto/v25y2021i1d10.1007_s00780-020-00434-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk arbitrage and hedging to acceptability under transaction costs

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Lépinette

    (Paris-Dauphine University
    Tunis-El Manar University)

  • Ilya Molchanov

    (University of Bern)

Abstract

The classical discrete-time model of proportional transaction costs relies on the assumption that a feasible portfolio process has solvent increments at each step. We extend this setting in two directions, allowing convex transaction costs and assuming that increments of the portfolio process belong to the sum of a solvency set and a family of multivariate acceptable positions, e.g. with respect to a dynamic risk measure. We describe the sets of superhedging prices, formulate several no (risk) arbitrage conditions and explore connections between them. In the special case when multivariate positions are converted into a single fixed asset, our framework turns into the no-good-deals setting. However, in general, the possibilities of assessing the risk with respect to any asset or a basket of assets lead to a decrease of superhedging prices and the no-arbitrage conditions become stronger. The mathematical techniques rely on results for unbounded and possibly non-closed random sets in Euclidean space.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Lépinette & Ilya Molchanov, 2021. "Risk arbitrage and hedging to acceptability under transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 101-132, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:25:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s00780-020-00434-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00780-020-00434-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00780-020-00434-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00780-020-00434-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Cherny & Pavel Grigoriev, 2007. "Dilatation monotone risk measures are law invariant," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 291-298, April.
    2. Magnus Willesson, 2017. "What Is and What Is not Regulatory Arbitrage? A Review and Syntheses," Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions, in: Giusy Chesini & Elisa Giaretta & Andrea Paltrinieri (ed.), Financial Markets, SME Financing and Emerging Economies, chapter 0, pages 71-94, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. John H. Cochrane & Jesus Saa-Requejo, 2000. "Beyond Arbitrage: Good-Deal Asset Price Bounds in Incomplete Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(1), pages 79-119, February.
    4. (**), Christophe Stricker & (*), Miklós Rásonyi & Yuri Kabanov, 2002. "No-arbitrage criteria for financial markets with efficient friction," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 371-382.
    5. Patrick Cheridito & Michael Kupper & Ludovic Tangpi, 2016. "Duality formulas for robust pricing and hedging in discrete time," Papers 1602.06177, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2017.
    6. Yuri Kabanov, 2009. "Markets with Transaction Costs. Mathematical Theory," Post-Print hal-00488168, HAL.
    7. Umut Çetin & Robert A. Jarrow & Philip Protter, 2008. "Liquidity risk and arbitrage pricing theory," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Financial Derivatives Pricing Selected Works of Robert Jarrow, chapter 8, pages 153-183, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Emmanuel Denis & Yuri Kabanov, 2012. "Consistent price systems and arbitrage opportunities of the second kind in models with transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 135-154, January.
    9. Alexander Cherny, 2007. "Pricing and hedging European options with discrete-time coherent risk," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 537-569, October.
    10. Hiai, Fumio & Umegaki, Hisaharu, 1977. "Integrals, conditional expectations, and martingales of multivalued functions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 149-182, March.
    11. Ignacio Cascos & Ilya Molchanov, 2007. "Multivariate risks and depth-trimmed regions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 373-397, July.
    12. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2013. "A comparison of techniques for dynamic multivariate risk measures," Papers 1305.2151, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2015.
    13. Andreas H. Hamel & Birgit Rudloff & Mihaela Yankova, 2012. "Set-valued average value at risk and its computation," Papers 1202.5702, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2013.
    14. Andreas Löhne & Birgit Rudloff, 2014. "An Algorithm For Calculating The Set Of Superhedging Portfolios In Markets With Transaction Costs," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(02), pages 1-33.
    15. Walter Schachermayer, 2004. "The Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing under Proportional Transaction Costs in Finite Discrete Time," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 19-48, January.
    16. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2015. "Multi-portfolio time consistency for set-valued convex and coherent risk measures," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 67-107, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emmanuel Lepinette & Duc Thinh Vu, 2024. "Coherent Risk Measure on $L^0$: NA Condition, Pricing and Dual Representation," Papers 2405.06764, arXiv.org.
    2. Ilya Molchanov & Anja Mühlemann, 2021. "Nonlinear expectations of random sets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 5-41, January.
    3. Çağın Ararat & Zachary Feinstein, 2021. "Set-valued risk measures as backward stochastic difference inclusions and equations," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 43-76, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuel Lepinette & Ilya Molchanov, 2016. "Risk Arbitrage and Hedging to Acceptability under Transaction Costs," Papers 1605.07884, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    2. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2017. "A recursive algorithm for multivariate risk measures and a set-valued Bellman’s principle," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 47-69, May.
    3. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2015. "A recursive algorithm for multivariate risk measures and a set-valued Bellman's principle," Papers 1508.02367, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2016.
    4. Lepinette, Emmanuel & Tran, Tuan, 2017. "Arbitrage theory for non convex financial market models," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 127(10), pages 3331-3353.
    5. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2015. "A Supermartingale Relation for Multivariate Risk Measures," Papers 1510.05561, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2018.
    6. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2018. "Scalar multivariate risk measures with a single eligible asset," Papers 1807.10694, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    7. Emmanuel Lepinette, 2020. "Random optimization on random sets," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(1), pages 159-173, February.
    8. Martin Brown & Tomasz Zastawniak, 2020. "Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing under fixed and proportional transaction costs," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 423-433, September.
    9. Bruno Bouchard & Adrien Nguyen Huu, 2013. "No marginal arbitrage of the second kind for high production regimes in discrete time production-investment models with proportional transaction costs," Post-Print hal-00487030, HAL.
    10. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2018. "Time consistency for scalar multivariate risk measures," Papers 1810.04978, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    11. Molchanov, Ilya, 2013. "Multivariate risk measures : a constructive approach based on selections," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws130101, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    12. Alet Roux, 2016. "Pricing And Hedging Game Options In Currency Models With Proportional Transaction Costs," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(07), pages 1-25, November.
    13. Erhan Bayraktar & Yuchong Zhang, 2016. "Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing Under Transaction Costs and Model Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 1039-1054, August.
    14. Takaki Hayashi & Yuta Koike, 2017. "No arbitrage and lead-lag relationships," Papers 1712.09854, arXiv.org.
    15. Tomasz R. Bielecki & Igor Cialenco & Ismail Iyigunler & Rodrigo Rodriguez, 2012. "Dynamic Conic Finance: Pricing and Hedging in Market Models with Transaction Costs via Dynamic Coherent Acceptability Indices," Papers 1205.4790, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2013.
    16. Christoph Kuhn, 2023. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing with and without transaction costs," Papers 2307.00571, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    17. Andreas H. Hamel & Frank Heyde, 2021. "Set-Valued T -Translative Functions and Their Applications in Finance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-33, September.
    18. Tomasz Zastawniak, 2024. "Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing under fixed and proportional costs in multi-asset setting and finite probability space," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 47(1), pages 137-149, June.
    19. Paolo Guasoni & Mikl'os R'asonyi, 2015. "Hedging, arbitrage and optimality with superlinear frictions," Papers 1506.05895, arXiv.org.
    20. Maria Arduca & Cosimo Munari, 2021. "Risk measures beyond frictionless markets," Papers 2111.08294, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Acceptance set; Risk arbitrage; Risk measure; Superhedging; Good deal; Solvency set; Random set; Transaction costs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:25:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s00780-020-00434-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.