IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurjtl/v8y2019i1d10.1007_s13676-018-0118-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sterilization network design

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Saif

    (Dalhousie University)

  • Samir Elhedhli

    (University of Waterloo)

Abstract

With the increasing costs of health care, service providers are looking for innovative ways to cut cost without sacrificing high service quality. Resource pooling is a promising trend in different health care areas, and sterilization is no exception. Specialized medical sterilization centers (SCs) that offer reusable medical device (RMD) sterilization services for hospitals have the potential to cut cost and improve efficiency through better utilization of resources, risk-pooling and economies of scale. However, it is unclear whether the resulting cost savings can offset the additional transportation costs and the operational complications associated with a centralized system. We compare three schemes to organize RMD sterilization in a group of hospitals: fully distributed, centralized processing, and centralized processing and stock keeping. The sterilization network design problem is formulated as a mixed-integer concave minimization program (MISOCP) that considers economies of scale, service level requirements and variable demand, with the objective of minimizing capacity, transportation, and inventory holding costs. The mathematical model is reformulated as a mixed-integer second-order cone program with a piecewise-linear cost function so it can be solved efficiently. We also consider the case when the first two moments of the RMD demand distributions are not known with certainty but are rather estimated based on sample data. We show that, with proper selection of the uncertainty structure, the robust nonlinear optimization problem can be tractably reformulated as a MISOCP as well. Testing on a realistic case study under different scenarios reveals that significant cost savings can be achieved by consolidating sterilization services. Compared to the distributed scheme, we found that cost saving in the second scheme is attributed primarily to improved resource utilization and economies of scale. Risk-pooling in the last scheme results in an additional small cost saving that has to be weighed against other operational and legal considerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Saif & Samir Elhedhli, 2019. "Sterilization network design," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(1), pages 91-115, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurjtl:v:8:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s13676-018-0118-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s13676-018-0118-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13676-018-0118-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13676-018-0118-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    2. Mark Daskin & Collette Coullard & Zuo-Jun Shen, 2002. "An Inventory-Location Model: Formulation, Solution Algorithm and Computational Results," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 110(1), pages 83-106, February.
    3. Houda Tlahig & Aida Jebali & Hanen Bouchriha, 2009. "A two-phased approach for the centralisation versus decentralisation of the hospital sterilisation service department," European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 227-246.
    4. James E. Smith & Robert L. Winkler, 2006. "The Optimizer's Curse: Skepticism and Postdecision Surprise in Decision Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 311-322, March.
    5. Saif, Ahmed & Elhedhli, Samir, 2016. "Cold supply chain design with environmental considerations: A simulation-optimization approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 274-287.
    6. Gary D. Eppen, 1979. "Note--Effects of Centralization on Expected Costs in a Multi-Location Newsboy Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 498-501, May.
    7. M Cherikh, 2000. "On the effect of centralisation on expected profits in a multi-location Newsboy problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(6), pages 755-761, June.
    8. Joris Klundert & Philippe Muls & Maarten Schadd, 2008. "Optimizing sterilization logistics in hospitals," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 23-33, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steffen Rickers & Florian Sahling, 2024. "Integrated procurement and reprocessing planning for reusable medical devices with a limited shelf life," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 168-187, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Navneet Vidyarthi & Emre Çelebi & Samir Elhedhli & Elizabeth Jewkes, 2007. "Integrated Production-Inventory-Distribution System Design with Risk Pooling: Model Formulation and Heuristic Solution," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 392-408, August.
    2. Sun, Hao & Yang, Jun & Yang, Chao, 2019. "A robust optimization approach to multi-interval location-inventory and recharging planning for electric vehicles," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 59-75.
    3. Congdong Li & Hao Guo & Ying Zhang & Shuai Deng & Yu Wang, 2018. "An Improved Differential Evolution Algorithm for a Multicommodity Location-Inventory Problem with False Failure Returns," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, October.
    4. Shunichi Ohmori, 2021. "A Predictive Prescription Using Minimum Volume k -Nearest Neighbor Enclosing Ellipsoid and Robust Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Donya Rahmani, 2019. "Designing a robust and dynamic network for the emergency blood supply chain with the risk of disruptions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 613-641, December.
    6. Abu Hashan Md Mashud & Hui-Ming Wee & Chiao-Ven Huang & Jei-Zheng Wu, 2020. "Optimal Replenishment Policy for Deteriorating Products in a Newsboy Problem with Multiple Just-in-Time Deliveries," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Moghadam, Hani Shahmoradi, 2016. "Designing a supply chain resilient to major disruptions and supply/demand interruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 121-149.
    8. Zhang, Ying & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Qi, Mingyao & Miao, Lixin, 2016. "A heterogeneous reliable location model with risk pooling under supply disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 151-178.
    9. Adam Diamant & Joseph Milner & Fayez Quereshy & Bo Xu, 2018. "Inventory management of reusable surgical supplies," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 439-459, September.
    10. Chen, Qingxin & Ma, Shoufeng & Li, Hongming & Zhu, Ning & He, Qiao-Chu, 2024. "Optimizing bike rebalancing strategies in free-floating bike-sharing systems: An enhanced distributionally robust approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Schuster Puga, Matías & Minner, Stefan & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien, 2019. "Two-stage supply chain design with safety stock placement decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 183-193.
    12. Sourirajan, Karthik & Ozsen, Leyla & Uzsoy, Reha, 2009. "A genetic algorithm for a single product network design model with lead time and safety stock considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 599-608, September.
    13. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Dynamic supply chain network design for the supply of blood in disasters: A robust model with real world application," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 225-244.
    14. Berman, Oded & Krass, Dmitry & Tajbakhsh, M. Mahdi, 2012. "A coordinated location-inventory model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 500-508.
    15. Escalona, P. & Ordóñez, F. & Marianov, V., 2015. "Joint location-inventory problem with differentiated service levels using critical level policy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 141-157.
    16. Barbry, Adrien & Anjos, Miguel F. & Delage, Erick & Schell, Kristen R., 2019. "Robust self-scheduling of a price-maker energy storage facility in the New York electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 629-646.
    17. Xiao, Li & Wang, Ce, 2023. "Multi-location newsvendor problem with random yield: Centralization versus decentralization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    18. Ali Diabat & Jean-Philippe Richard & Craig Codrington, 2013. "A Lagrangian relaxation approach to simultaneous strategic and tactical planning in supply chain design," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 55-80, March.
    19. Georgia Perakis & Melvyn Sim & Qinshen Tang & Peng Xiong, 2023. "Robust Pricing and Production with Information Partitioning and Adaptation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1398-1419, March.
    20. Gülpınar, Nalan & Pachamanova, Dessislava & Çanakoğlu, Ethem, 2013. "Robust strategies for facility location under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 21-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurjtl:v:8:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s13676-018-0118-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.