IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v25y2024i9d10.1007_s10198-024-01685-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic value of diastasis repair with the use of mesh compared to no intervention in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Carla Rognoni

    (Bocconi University)

  • Alessandro Carrara

    (Ospedale Santa Chiara)

  • Micaela Piccoli

    (UOC di Chirurgia Generale, d’Urgenza e Nuove Tecnologie dell’OCB (Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara), AOU (Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria) di Modena)

  • Vincenzo Trapani

    (UOC di Chirurgia Generale, d’Urgenza e Nuove Tecnologie dell’OCB (Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara), AOU (Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria) di Modena)

  • Nereo Vettoretto

    (UOC di Chirurgia Generale del Presidio Ospedaliero di Montichiari, AO Spedali Civili di Brescia)

  • Giorgio Soliani

    (Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria)

  • Rosanna Tarricone

    (Bocconi University
    Bocconi University)

Abstract

Aim Rectus abdominal diastasis (RAD) can cause mainly incontinence and lower-back pain. Despite its high incidence, there is no consensus regarding surgical indication. We aimed at comparing RAD repair (minimally invasive technique with mesh implant) with no treatment (standard of care – SOC) through cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses from both National Healthcare Service (NHS) and societal perspectives in Italy. Methods A model was developed including social costs and productivity losses derived by the online administration of a socio-economic questionnaire, including the EuroQol for the assessment of quality of life. Costs for the NHS were based on reimbursement tariffs. Results Over a lifetime horizon, estimated costs were 64,115€ for SOC and 46,541€ for RAD repair in the societal perspective; QALYs were 19.55 and 25.75 for the two groups, respectively. Considering the NHS perspective, RAD repair showed an additional cost per patient of 5,104€ compared to SOC, leading to an ICUR of 824€. RAD repair may be either cost-saving or cost-effective compared to SOC depending on the perspective considered. Considering a current scenario of 100% SOC, an increased diffusion of RAD repair from 2 to 10% in the next 5 years would lead to an incremental cost of 184,147,624€ for the whole society (87% borne by the NHS) and to incremental 16,155 QALYs. Conclusion In light of the lack of economic evaluations for minimally invasive RAD repair, the present study provides relevant clinical and economic evidence to help improving the decision-making process and allocating scarce resources between competing ends.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla Rognoni & Alessandro Carrara & Micaela Piccoli & Vincenzo Trapani & Nereo Vettoretto & Giorgio Soliani & Rosanna Tarricone, 2024. "Economic value of diastasis repair with the use of mesh compared to no intervention in Italy," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(9), pages 1569-1580, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:9:d:10.1007_s10198-024-01685-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01685-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-024-01685-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-024-01685-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:9:d:10.1007_s10198-024-01685-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.