IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v25y2024i4d10.1007_s10198-023-01617-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Jeroen H. J. Paulissen

    (University Medical Center Groningen
    Asc Academics)

  • Ahmed H. Seddik

    (Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH)

  • Kyle J. Dunton

    (Daiichi Sankyo UK Ltd)

  • Christopher J. Livings

    (AstraZeneca Plc.)

  • Marinus Hulst

    (University Medical Center Groningen
    Martini Hospital)

  • Maarten J. Postma

    (University Medical Center Groningen)

  • Lisa A. Jong

    (University Medical Center Groningen)

  • Roel D. Freriks

    (Asc Academics
    University of Groningen)

Abstract

Objectives Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently recommended by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use as a treatment for adult patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, who had received a prior anti-HER2-based regimen. In our study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd compared with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for this indication in Finland. Methods A three-state partitioned survival analysis model was developed with a payer’s perspective. Time to event data from the DESTINY-Breast03 (DB-03) trial were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon either directly—for progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation—or using an alternative approach utilizing long-term T-DM1 survival data and DB-03 data—for overall survival. Discount rates of 3% were applied for costs and effects. Inputs were sourced from the Medicinal Products Database from Kela, Helsinki University Hospital service price list, Finnish Medicines Agency assessments, clinical experts, and DB-03. Sensitivity analyses were performed to characterize and demonstrate parameter uncertainties in the model. Results Total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were 1.93 and 2.56, respectively. Incremental costs for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 were €106,800, resulting in an ICER of €55,360 per QALY gained and an ICER of €41,775 per LY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the hazard ratio of T-DXd vs T-DM1 for OS was the most influential parameter. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed similar results to the base case. Conclusions T-DXd is cost-effective based on surrogate WTP thresholds of €72,000 and €139,000 per QALY.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeroen H. J. Paulissen & Ahmed H. Seddik & Kyle J. Dunton & Christopher J. Livings & Marinus Hulst & Maarten J. Postma & Lisa A. Jong & Roel D. Freriks, 2024. "Cost-effectiveness model of trastuzumab deruxtecan as second-line treatment in HER2-positive unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer in Finland," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(4), pages 689-699, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10198-023-01617-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-023-01617-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cost-effectiveness; Breast cancer; Metastatic; HER2-positive; Trastuzumab deruxtecan;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s10198-023-01617-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.