IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v25y2024i2d10.1007_s10198-023-01589-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generating EQ-5D-3L health utility scores from the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: a perinatal mapping study

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth M. Camacho

    (University of Manchester)

  • Gemma E. Shields

    (University of Manchester)

  • Carolyn A. Chew-Graham

    (Keele University)

  • Emily Eisner

    (University of Manchester
    Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Simon Gilbody

    (University of York)

  • Elizabeth Littlewood

    (University of York)

  • Dean McMillan

    (University of York)

  • Kylie Watson

    (Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust)

  • Pasco Fearon

    (University College London)

  • Deborah J. Sharp

    (University of Bristol)

Abstract

Background Perinatal depression (PND) describes depression experienced by parents during pregnancy or in the first year after a baby is born. The EQ-5D instrument (a generic measure of health status) is not often collected in perinatal research, however disease-specific measures, such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) are widely used. Mapping can be used to estimate generic health utility index values from disease-specific measures like the EPDS. Objective To develop a mapping algorithm to estimate EQ-5D utility index values from the EPDS. Methods Patient-level data from the BaBY PaNDA study (English observational cohort study) provided 1068 observations with paired EPDS and EQ-5D (3-level version; EQ-5D-3L) responses. We compared the performance of six alternative regression model types, each with four specifications of covariates (EPDS score and age: base, squared, and cubed). Model performance (ability to predict utility values) was assessed by ranking mean error, mean absolute error, and root mean square error. Algorithm performance in 3 external datasets was also evaluated. Results There was moderate correlation between EPDS score and utility values (coefficient: – 0.42). The best performing model type was a two-part model, followed by ordinary least squared. Inclusion of squared and cubed covariates improved model performance. Based on graphs of observed and predicted utility values, the algorithm performed better when utility was above 0.6. Conclusions This direct mapping algorithm allows the estimation of health utility values from EPDS scores. The algorithm has good external validity but is likely to perform better in samples with higher health status.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth M. Camacho & Gemma E. Shields & Carolyn A. Chew-Graham & Emily Eisner & Simon Gilbody & Elizabeth Littlewood & Dean McMillan & Kylie Watson & Pasco Fearon & Deborah J. Sharp, 2024. "Generating EQ-5D-3L health utility scores from the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: a perinatal mapping study," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(2), pages 319-332, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10198-023-01589-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01589-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-023-01589-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-023-01589-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10198-023-01589-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.