IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v25y2024i2d10.1007_s10198-023-01581-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside the inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 trial: rituximab in children and adolescents with B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Author

Listed:
  • Béranger Lueza

    (Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay
    INSERM 1018, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ)

  • Anne Aupérin

    (Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay
    INSERM 1018, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ)

  • Charlotte Rigaud

    (Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Thomas G. Gross

    (Children’s Hospital Colorado)

  • Marta Pillon

    (University of Padova)

  • Rafael F. Delgado

    (University of Valencia)

  • Anne Uyttebroeck

    (University Hospitals Leuven)

  • G. A. Amos Burke

    (Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital)

  • József Zsíros

    (Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology)

  • Monika Csóka

    (Semmelweis University)

  • Mathieu Simonin

    (Armand Trousseau Hospital-APHP, Sorbonne University)

  • Catherine Patte

    (Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Véronique Minard-Colin

    (Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay
    INSERM 1015, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Julia Bonastre

    (Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay
    INSERM 1018, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ)

Abstract

Objectives The randomized controlled trial Inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 showed overall survival (OS) benefit and event-free survival (EFS) benefit with the addition of rituximab to standard Lymphomes Malins B (LMB) chemotherapy in children and adolescents with high-risk, mature B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Our aim was to assess the cost-effectiveness of rituximab-chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the French setting. Methods We used a decision-analytic semi-Markov model with four health states and 1-month cycles. Resource use was prospectively collected in the Inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 trial (NCT01516580). Transition probabilities were assessed from patient-level data from the trial (n = 328). In the base case analysis, direct medical costs from the French National Insurance Scheme and life-years (LYs) were computed in both arms over a 3-year time horizon. Incremental net monetary benefit and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve were computed through a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Deterministic sensitivity analysis and several sensitivity analyses on key assumptions were also conducted, including one exploratory analysis with quality-adjusted life years as the health outcome. Results OS and EFS benefits shown in the Inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 trial translated into the model by rituximab-chemotherapy being the most effective and also the least expensive strategy over the chemotherapy strategy. The mean difference in LYs between arms was 0.13 [95% CI 0.02; 0.25], and the mean cost difference € − 3 710 [95% CI € − 17,877; € 10,525] in favor of rituximab-chemotherapy group. For a € 50,000 per LY willingness-to-pay threshold, the probability of the rituximab-chemotherapy strategy being cost-effective was 91.1%. All sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings. Conclusion Adding rituximab to LMB chemotherapy in children and adolescents with high-risk mature B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is highly cost-effective in France. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01516580.

Suggested Citation

  • Béranger Lueza & Anne Aupérin & Charlotte Rigaud & Thomas G. Gross & Marta Pillon & Rafael F. Delgado & Anne Uyttebroeck & G. A. Amos Burke & József Zsíros & Monika Csóka & Mathieu Simonin & Catherine, 2024. "Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside the inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 trial: rituximab in children and adolescents with B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(2), pages 307-317, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10198-023-01581-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01581-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-023-01581-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-023-01581-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:25:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10198-023-01581-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.