IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v20y2019i2d10.1007_s10198-018-0994-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential savings in the treatment pathway of liver transplantation: an inter-sectorial analysis of cost-rising factors

Author

Listed:
  • Lena Harries

    (Hannover Medical School
    Hannover Medical School)

  • Jill Gwiasda

    (Hannover Medical School)

  • Zhi Qu

    (Hannover Medical School
    Hannover Medical School)

  • Harald Schrem

    (Hannover Medical School
    Hannover Medical School)

  • Christian Krauth

    (Hannover Medical School
    Hannover Medical School)

  • Volker Eric Amelung

    (Hannover Medical School
    Hannover Medical School)

Abstract

Introduction Identification of cost-driving factors in patients undergoing liver transplantation is essential to target reallocation of resources and potential savings. Aim The aim of this study is to identify main cost-driving factors in liver transplantation from the perspective of the Statutory Health Insurance. Methods Variables were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression to determine their influence on high cost cases (fourth quartile) in the outpatient, inpatient and rehabilitative healthcare sectors as well as for medications. Results Significant cost-driving factors for the inpatient sector of care were a high labMELD-score (OR 1.042), subsequent re-transplantations (OR 7.159) and patient mortality (OR 3.555). Expenditures for rehabilitative care were significantly higher in patients with a lower adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (OR 0.601). The indication of viral cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma resulted in significantly higher costs for medications (OR 21.618 and 7.429). For all sectors of care and medications each waiting day had a significant impact on high treatment costs (OR 1.001). Overall, cost-driving factors resulted in higher median treatment costs of 211,435 €. Conclusions Treatment costs in liver transplantation were significantly influenced by identified factors. Long pre-transplant waiting times that increase overall treatment costs need to be alleviated by a substantial increase in donor organs to enable transplantation with lower labMELD-scores. Disease management programs, the implementation of a case management for vulnerable patients, medication plans and patient tracking in a transplant registry may enable cost savings, e.g., by the avoidance of otherwise necessary re-transplants or incorrect medication.

Suggested Citation

  • Lena Harries & Jill Gwiasda & Zhi Qu & Harald Schrem & Christian Krauth & Volker Eric Amelung, 2019. "Potential savings in the treatment pathway of liver transplantation: an inter-sectorial analysis of cost-rising factors," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(2), pages 281-301, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:20:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10198-018-0994-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-018-0994-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-018-0994-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-018-0994-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary Charlson & Martin T Wells & Ralph Ullman & Fionnuala King & Celia Shmukler, 2014. "The Charlson Comorbidity Index Can Be Used Prospectively to Identify Patients Who Will Incur High Future Costs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manuel Melo Mateus & Margarida Catalão-Lopes & Rui Portugal, 2023. "Survival analysis of cancer patients in Portugal following the reference centre model implementation," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(2), pages 157-168, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mengna Luan & Wenjing Shi & Zhigang Tao & Hongjie Yuan, 2023. "When patients have better insurance coverage in China: Provider incentives, costs, and quality of care," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 1073-1106, October.
    2. Harry Comber & Marianna De Camargo Cancela & Trutz Haase & Howard Johnson & Linda Sharp & Jonathan Pratschke, 2016. "Affluence and Private Health Insurance Influence Treatment and Survival in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Piotr Swierkowski & Adrian Barnett, 2018. "Identification of hospital cost drivers using sparse group lasso," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Geir Fagerjord Lorem & Henrik Schirmer & Nina Emaus, 2016. "Health Impact Index. Development and Validation of a Method for Classifying Comorbid Disease Measured against Self-Reported Health," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Wenkang Ma & Ana Timóteo & Vanessa Ribeiro & Céu Mateus & Julian Perelman, 2024. "Contribution of high-technology procedures to public healthcare expenditures: the case of ischemic heart disease in Portugal, 2002–2015," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 419-437, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    High cost cases; Cost analysis of liver transplantation; Sectors of healthcare; Cross-sectorial costs; German healthcare costs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:20:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10198-018-0994-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.