IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v15y2014i1p13-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health technology assessment in Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria

Author

Listed:
  • László Gulácsi
  • Alexandru Rotar
  • Maciej Niewada
  • Olga Löblová
  • Fanni Rencz
  • Guenka Petrova
  • Imre Boncz
  • Niek Klazinga

Abstract

This paper describes and discusses the development and use of health technology assessment (HTA) in five Central and Eastern European countries (CEE): Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria. It provides a general snapshot of HTA policies in the selected CEE countries to date by focusing on country case-studies based on document analysis and expert opinion. It offers an overview of similarities and differences between the individual CEE countries and discusses in detail the role of HTA by assessing its formalization and institutionalization, standardization of methodology, the use of HTA in practice and the degree of professionalization of HTA in the region. It finds that HTA has been to some extent implemented in all five countries studied, with methodologies in accordance with international standards, but that challenges remain when it comes to the role of HTA in health care decision-making as well as to human resource capacities of the countries. This paper suggests that coming years will show whether CEE countries develop adequate national analytical capacity to assess and appraise technologies in the context of local need and affordability, instead of using HTA as a mere administrative procedure to fulfill (inter)national requirements. Finally, suggestions are provided to strengthen HTA in CEE countries through cooperation, mutual learning, a common accreditation of HTA bodies and increased network building among CEE HTA experts. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Suggested Citation

  • László Gulácsi & Alexandru Rotar & Maciej Niewada & Olga Löblová & Fanni Rencz & Guenka Petrova & Imre Boncz & Niek Klazinga, 2014. "Health technology assessment in Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(1), pages 13-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:15:y:2014:i:1:p:13-25
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-014-0590-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10198-014-0590-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-014-0590-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCabe, C & Claxton, K & Culyer, AJ, 2008. "The NICE Cost-Effectiveness Threshold: What it is and What that Means," MPRA Paper 26466, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Allen, Nicola & Pichler, Franz & Wang, Tina & Patel, Sundip & Salek, Sam, 2013. "Development of archetypes for non-ranking classification and comparison of European National Health Technology Assessment systems," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 305-312.
    3. Lopert, Ruth & Ruiz, Francis & Chalkidou, Kalipso, 2013. "Applying rapid ‘de-facto’ HTA in resource-limited settings: Experience from Romania," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(3), pages 202-208.
    4. Kolasa, Katarzyna & Schubert, Sebastian & Manca, Andrea & Hermanowski, Tadeusz, 2011. "A review of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) recommendations for drug therapies issued between 2007 and 2009 and their impact on policymaking processes in Poland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 145-151.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. García-Mochón, Leticia & Espín Balbino, Jaime & Olry de Labry Lima, Antonio & Caro Martinez, Araceli & Martin Ruiz, Eva & Pérez Velasco, Román, 2019. "HTA and decision-making processes in Central, Eastern and South Eastern Europe: Results from a survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 182-190.
    2. Rozmarinová Jana & Říhová Barbora, 2021. "Health Technology Assessment of the Medical Devices: A Case Study from the Czech Republic," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 253-272, December.
    3. László Gulácsi & Fanni Rencz & Márta Péntek & Valentin Brodszky & Ruth Lopert & Noémi Hevér & Petra Baji, 2014. "Transferability of results of cost utility analyses for biologicals in inflammatory conditions for Central and Eastern European countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(1), pages 27-34, May.
    4. László Gulácsi, 2014. "Biological and biosimilar therapies in inflammatory conditions: challenges for the Central and Eastern European countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(1), pages 1-4, May.
    5. Rotar, Alexandru M. & Preda, Alin & Löblová, Olga & Benkovic, Vanesa & Zawodnik, Szymon & Gulacsi, Laszlo & Niewada, Maciej & Boncz, Imre & Petrova, Guenka & Dimitrova, Maria & Klazinga, Niek, 2018. "Rationalizing the introduction and use of pharmaceutical products: The role of managed entry agreements in Central and Eastern European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 230-236.
    6. Fernando Antoñanzas & Robert Terkola & Maarten Postma, 2016. "The Value of Medicines: A Crucial but Vague Concept," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(12), pages 1227-1239, December.
    7. Barbara Więckowska & Monika Raulinajtys-Grzybek & Katarzyna Byszek, 2022. "Using the Dynamic SWOT Analysis to Assess Options for Implementing the HB-HTA Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Zoltán Lakner & Anna Kiss & József Popp & Zoltán Zéman & Domicián Máté & Judit Oláh, 2019. "From Basic Research to Competitiveness: An Econometric Analysis of the Global Pharmaceutical Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zoltán Kaló & Adrian Gheorghe & Mirjana Huic & Marcell Csanádi & Finn Boerlum Kristensen, 2016. "HTA Implementation Roadmap in Central and Eastern European Countries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(S1), pages 179-192, February.
    2. Csanádi, Marcell & Ozierański, Piotr & Löblová, Olga & King, Lawrence & Kaló, Zoltán & Botz, Lajos, 2019. "Shedding light on the HTA consultancy market: Insights from Poland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(12), pages 1237-1243.
    3. Refoios Camejo, Rodrigo & McGrath, Clare & Herings, Ron, 2011. "A dynamic perspective on pharmaceutical competition, drug development and cost effectiveness," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 18-24, April.
    4. Saha, Sanjib & Gerdtham, Ulf-G. & Toresson, Håkan & Minthon, Lennart & Jarl, Johan, 2018. "Economic Evaluation of Interventions for Screening of Dementia," Working Papers 2018:20, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    5. Ryuichi Ohta & Yoshinori Ryu & Daisuke Kataoka & Chiaki Sano, 2021. "Effectiveness and Challenges in Local Self-Governance: Multifunctional Autonomy in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-14, January.
    6. John Vernon & Robert Goldberg & Joseph Golec, 2009. "Economic Evaluation and Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 27(10), pages 797-806, October.
    7. Scott Metcalfe & Rachel Grocott, 2010. "Comments on “Simoens, S. Health Economic Assessment: A Methodological Primer. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2009, 6, 2950-2966”—New Zealand in Fact Has No Cost-Effectiveness Threshold," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-4, April.
    8. Lionel Perrier & Anne Lefranc & David Pérol & Philippe Quittet & Aline Schmidt-Tanguy & Carole Siani & Christian Peretti & Bertrand Favier & Pierre Biron & Philippe Moreau & Jacques Bay & Séverine Lis, 2013. "Cost Effectiveness of Pegfilgrastim Versus Filgrastim After High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Lymphoma and Myeloma," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 129-138, April.
    9. Marieke Krol & Jocé Papenburg & Siok Swan Tan & Werner Brouwer & Leona Hakkaart, 2016. "A noticeable difference? Productivity costs related to paid and unpaid work in economic evaluations on expensive drugs," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(4), pages 391-402, May.
    10. Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein & Heidi Williams, 2016. "Paying on the Margin for Medical Care: Evidence from Breast Cancer Treatments," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 52-79, February.
    11. Thomas Grochtdreis & Hans-Helmut König & Alexander Dobruschkin & Gunhild von Amsberg & Judith Dams, 2018. "Cost-effectiveness analyses and cost analyses in castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Sanjib Saha & Ulf-G Gerdtham & Pia Johansson, 2010. "Economic Evaluation of Lifestyle Interventions for Preventing Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-46, August.
    13. László Gulácsi & Fanni Rencz & Márta Péntek & Valentin Brodszky & Ruth Lopert & Noémi Hevér & Petra Baji, 2014. "Transferability of results of cost utility analyses for biologicals in inflammatory conditions for Central and Eastern European countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(1), pages 27-34, May.
    14. Saha, Sanjib & Gerdtham, Ulf-G. & Toresson, Håkan & Minthon, Lennart & Jarl, Johan, 2018. "Economic Evaluation of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Dementia Patients and their Caregivers - A Systematic Literature Review," Working Papers 2018:10, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    15. Martin Hoyle, 2011. "Accounting for the Drug Life Cycle and Future Drug Prices in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Mark Sculpher & Karl Claxton, 2012. "Real Economics Needs to Reflect Real Decisions," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 133-136, February.
    17. Anna Nicolet & Antoinette D I van Asselt & Karin M Vermeulen & Paul F M Krabbe, 2020. "Value judgment of new medical treatments: Societal and patient perspectives to inform priority setting in The Netherlands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Simon Eckermann, 2015. "Kinky Thresholds Revisited: Opportunity Costs Differ in the NE and SW Quadrants," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 7-13, February.
    19. Katharina Schremser & Wolf Rogowski & Sigrid Adler-Reichel & Amanda Tufman & Rudolf Huber & Björn Stollenwerk, 2015. "Cost-Effectiveness of an Individualized First-Line Treatment Strategy Offering Erlotinib Based on EGFR Mutation Testing in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients in Germany," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(11), pages 1215-1228, November.
    20. L. Gulácsi & E. Orlewska & M. Péntek, 2012. "Health economics and health technology assessment in Central and Eastern Europe: a dose of reality," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(5), pages 525-531, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:15:y:2014:i:1:p:13-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.