IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v15y2014i1d10.1007_s10198-014-0601-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic burden of long-term care of rheumatoid arthritis patients in Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Zoltán Horváth

    (University of Pécs
    National Institute for Quality- and Organizational Development in Healthcare and Medicines (GYEMSZI))

  • Andor Sebestyén

    (University of Pécs
    National Health Insurance Fund Administration (OEP))

  • August Österle

    (Corvinus University of Budapest
    Vienna University of Economics and Business)

  • Dóra Endrei

    (University of Pécs)

  • József Betlehem

    (University of Pécs)

  • András Oláh

    (University of Pécs)

  • László Imre

    (National Institute for Quality- and Organizational Development in Healthcare and Medicines (GYEMSZI))

  • Gabriella Bagosi

    (National Institute for Quality- and Organizational Development in Healthcare and Medicines (GYEMSZI))

  • Imre Boncz

    (University of Pécs
    Corvinus University of Budapest)

Abstract

Background and aim Long-term care (LTC) in Hungary is provided in four major ways: day care, nursing, chronic care, and rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to explore the financing of LTC in Hungary, with a disease-specific focus on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Data and methods Data were derived from the National Health Insurance Fund Administration (NHIFA). For 2012, we analyzed the following indicators: number of patients and cases, crude and weighted hospital days, and health insurance expenditure. Results The annual health insurance expenditure of LTC was 112.6 million EUR in Hungary in 2012 and covered 209,000 patients (225,000 cases). The NHIFA spent 0.69 million EUR for the LTC of 976 patients with RA. The annual health insurance cost per patient was significantly (by 32 %) higher for patients with RA (710 EUR) than the average cost of all patients (538 EUR). The average length of stay was also higher for patients with RA (19.7 days) than for the general LTC population (17.4 days). Conclusions The cost of LTC of patients with RA is higher than the average cost of the general LTC patient population. Early treatment of RA patients could contribute to decreasing LTC expenditure. More generally, health technology assessment can inform future LTC funding debates in Central and Eastern European countries by putting more emphasis on LTC utilization and costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoltán Horváth & Andor Sebestyén & August Österle & Dóra Endrei & József Betlehem & András Oláh & László Imre & Gabriella Bagosi & Imre Boncz, 2014. "Economic burden of long-term care of rheumatoid arthritis patients in Hungary," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(1), pages 131-135, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:15:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-014-0601-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-014-0601-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-014-0601-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-014-0601-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Health care financing; Long-term care; Health insurance; Rheumatoid arthritis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:15:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-014-0601-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.