Author
Listed:
- Katalin Gulyas
(University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center)
- Nora Bodnar
(University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center)
- Zsofia Nagy
(University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center)
- Szilvia Szamosi
(University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center)
- Agnes Horvath
(University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center)
- Andrea Vancsa
(University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center)
- Edit Vegh
(University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center)
- Zoltan Szabo
(University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center)
- Gabriella Szucs
(University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center)
- Zoltan Szekanecz
(University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center)
- Sandor Szanto
(University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center)
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, reasons for switching and drug survival of TNF-α inhibitors (TNFis) used as first- and second-line drugs in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods Data on patients suffering from AS and treated with at least one TNFi between November 2005 and 2013 were extracted retrospectively from the database of a single clinical centre. Beside demographic data, the disease activity measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the response rates (BASDAI50), reasons for switching and survival curves of TNFis were analysed in general and in subgroups of patients treated with each of the available TNFis. The reasons for switching were defined as inefficacy, side effects of the given drug, patient’s request and occurrence of extra-articular manifestations. Results Altogether, 175 patients were on TNFis and 77 of them received at least two TNFis. The patients’ age at the initiation of the first TNFi was higher among switchers compared to non-switchers (42.5 ± 12.6 vs. 38.8 ± 11.2 years, p = 0.049); otherwise, gender, disease duration and initial disease activity had no influence on the risk of switching. The decrease of the BASDAI was similar among non-switchers and switchers using either the first or second TNFi, but the response rates to the first and second TNFi were worse in switchers than in non-switchers. Following the failure of the first TNFi, the retention on therapy was unfavourable, especially in patients on infliximab after 1 year of treatment. The main reason for switching from the first drug was inefficacy. The frequency of side effects that led to switching was higher in the infliximab group than in patients treated with other agents. Conclusion Although the retention rate to a second-line TNFi was somewhat worse than that to the first-line TNFi, the switching of TNFis is a good therapeutic option in AS patients who failed to respond to the first TNFi.
Suggested Citation
Katalin Gulyas & Nora Bodnar & Zsofia Nagy & Szilvia Szamosi & Agnes Horvath & Andrea Vancsa & Edit Vegh & Zoltan Szabo & Gabriella Szucs & Zoltan Szekanecz & Sandor Szanto, 2014.
"Real-life experience with switching TNF-α inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis,"
The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(1), pages 93-100, May.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:15:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-014-0598-0
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-014-0598-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:15:y:2014:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-014-0598-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.